Kritisch

Quasar Framework: Stored/Reflected XSS via unescaped SSR meta tag rendering in getHead()

  • Veröffentlicht: 07.10.2026
  • Aktualisiert: 11.10.2026 10:22

Vulnerability Details

File: ui/src/utils/meta/Meta.js — actually ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js (lines 149-176: getAttr() and getHead()) Sink: injectServerMeta() (same file) → ctx.headTags += getHead(data), interpolated verbatim into the raw HTTP response <head> by the production SSR template (app-vite/templates/entry/ssr-prod-webserver.js + app-vite/lib/plugins/vite.html.js) Entry point: the public useMeta() composable (ui/src/composables/use-meta/use-meta.js) — the single documented way apps set page title/meta/link/script tags

Root Cause

getHead() is Quasar's SSR-only serializer that turns the meta/link/script/title data collected from every useMeta() call into a literal HTML string, using plain template-literal interpolation with zero HTML-entity escaping and zero attribute-quote escaping:

js
function getAttr(seed) {
  return att => {
    const val = seed[att]
    return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${val}"` : '')
  }
}

function getHead(meta) {
  let output = ''
  if (meta.title) {
    output += `<title>${meta.title}</title>`
  }
  ...
}

Contrast this with the client-side equivalent, apply() (same file, used only in the browser post-hydration), which builds the same tags via document.createElement(...) + tag.setAttribute(att, val) — the browser DOM API automatically escapes attribute values, so the client-side path is not vulnerable. getHead() is a separate, parallel implementation for the SSR case that never received the same protection.

Any string containing </title>, ", or > in a title, meta.*.content, link.*.href, or any other attribute value passed to useMeta() breaks out of its intended HTML context and injects arbitrary markup — including a live <script> tag — directly into the raw HTML response sent to every visitor.

Attack Scenario

  1. A Quasar SSR application renders dynamic page metadata via the standard, documented useMeta() pattern — e.g. useMeta(() => ({ title: post.title, meta: { description: { name: 'description', content: post.excerpt } } })) for a blog/CMS/product page.
  2. An attacker who can influence that underlying text (submit a blog post/comment, set their own profile display name, control a field in an integrated CMS/API) sets it to My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script>.
  3. On every SSR render of that page — for every visitor — getHead() emits this payload unescaped directly into the <head> of the raw HTML response.
  4. The victim's browser parses the HTML top-to-bottom; the injected <script> executes immediately, before hydration, with full access to document.cookie and the DOM.

Impact

  • Type: CWE-79 Cross-Site Scripting
  • Auth required: No (attacker only needs to influence any text that reaches useMeta() — an extremely common pattern, e.g. blog titles, product names, user display names)
  • Consequence: Full client-side script execution in the victim site's origin — session/cookie theft, credential phishing overlays, account takeover, defacement. Unlike a typical XSS bug requiring a specific unusual injection point, this affects the single most common useMeta() use case (rendering any dynamic title/description), so it can be triggered even by ordinary content containing &, <, or " without malicious intent, in addition to being trivially exploitable deliberately.

Vulnerable Code (ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js lines 149-176)

js
function getAttr(seed) {
  return att => {
    const val = seed[att]
    return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${val}"` : '')
  }
}

function getHead(meta) {
  let output = ''
  if (meta.title) {
    output += `<title>${meta.title}</title>`
  }
  ;['meta', 'link', 'script'].forEach(type => {
    const metaType = meta[type]
    for (const att in metaType) {
      const attrs = Object.keys(metaType[att])
        .filter(item => item !== 'innerHTML')
        .map(getAttr(metaType[att]))
      output += `<${type} ${attrs.join(' ')} data-qmeta="${att}">`
      if (type === 'script') {
        output += (metaType[att].innerHTML || '') + '</script>'
      }
    }
  })
  return output
}

Recommended Fix

js
function escapeHtml(val) {
  return String(val)
    .replaceAll('&', '&amp;')
    .replaceAll('<', '&lt;')
    .replaceAll('>', '&gt;')
    .replaceAll('"', '&quot;')
}

function getAttr(seed) {
  return att => {
    const val = seed[att]
    return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${escapeHtml(val)}"` : '')
  }
}

function getHead(meta) {
  let output = ''
  if (meta.title) {
    output += `<title>${escapeHtml(meta.title)}</title>`
  }
  // ... rest unchanged, script innerHTML intentionally left raw (JSON-LD use case)
}

Verification

Confirmed end-to-end on v2.21.1 via a local Node.js HTTP lab harness that imports the real, unmodified Meta.js source and reproduces the exact useMeta() → injectServerMeta() call sequence a real SSR app performs, reached via actual curl requests (not just isolated function calls):

  1. POST /submit with {"title":"My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script>","description":"\"><script>alert(document.domain)</script>"}
  2. GET /render/1 returned a raw HTTP response whose <head> contained: <title>My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script></title><meta name="description" content=""><script>alert(document.domain)</script>" data-qmeta="description">
  3. Verified via grep: 0 occurrences of &lt; (nothing was escaped), 1 occurrence of a literal, unescaped <script>alert(...)</script> tag in the actual HTTP response body.

A fix branch (fix/xss-meta-tag-escaping) is ready with the minimal patch above (adds an escapeHtml() helper used in getAttr()/getHead()); re-running the same PoC against the patched code shows the payload fully HTML-entity-encoded (&lt;script&gt;...) with no live <script> tag, while normal titles containing & still render correctly (&amp;).

Betroffene Software

Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.

PlattformPaketAnfällige VersionenBehoben in
npm-Paket quasar < 2.22.0 2.22.0

Verweise

CVSS-Wert 10/10
CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-116, CWE-79
Plattform
npm
Paket
quasar
Veröffentlicht
07.10.2026
Aktualisiert
11.10.2026 10:22

Quellen und Lizenzen

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254 - CC BY 4.0

Schwachstellenhistorie: quasar

Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (npm-Paket), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.

Einträge insgesamt
4
Erste → letzte
07.2026 10.2026
Ohne Fix
0
In Angriffen ausgenutzt
0

Verteilung nach Schweregrad

  • Kritisch 1
  • Hoch 1
  • Mittel 1
  • Niedrig 1

Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr

  1. 2026: 4
  1. Quasar Framework: Stored/Reflected XSS via unescaped SSR meta tag rendering in getHead() dieser Eintrag
    Kritisch · 10.0 CVE-2026-106102 < 2.22.0 2.22.0
  2. Mittel · 5.6 CVE-2026-73647 < 2.22.0 2.22.0

Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung

Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.

Anwendung verbinden
DockRay Newsletter

Anwendungssicherheit in Ihrem Postfach

Wichtige Schwachstellen, konkrete Empfehlungen und praktische Tipps für Ihre Anwendungen. Wählen Sie Ihre Technologien und verfolgen Sie, was für Ihr Projekt relevant ist.

  • Eine tägliche Zusammenfassung neuer Schwachstellen, auch kritischer.
  • Benachrichtigungen über wichtige Updates.
  • Praktische Tipps zur Sicherheit und Überwachung von Anwendungen.

Leer lassen, um Meldungen zu allen Technologien zu erhalten.

Kostenlos anmelden. In jeder E-Mail mit einem Klick abmelden.