Mittel

HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack

  • Veröffentlicht: 10.10.2023
  • Aktualisiert: 11.10.2026 13:20

CISA bestätigt die Ausnutzung dieser Schwachstelle in realen Angriffen. Prüfen Sie vorrangig, ob Ihre Anwendung betroffen ist. CISA KEV · CC0 1.0

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack

The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RST_STREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RST_STREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RST_STREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RST_STREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory

swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

Betroffene Software

Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.

PlattformPaketAnfällige VersionenBehoben in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11 <= 10.1.15 keine Korrektur
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.12 < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.13 < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53, >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17, >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17 9.4.53, 10.0.17, 11.0.17
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-server >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53, >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17, >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17 9.4.53, 10.0.17, 11.0.17
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-common >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2 12.0.2
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-server >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2 12.0.2

Verweise

CVSS-Wert 5.3/10
CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:H
Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-400
Plattform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Paket
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core, com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11, com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.12
Veröffentlicht
10.10.2023
Aktualisiert
11.10.2026 13:20

Quellen und Lizenzen

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 - CC BY 4.0

Schwachstellenhistorie: org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core

Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.

Alle (77) im Archiv
Einträge insgesamt
77
Erste → letzte
10.2018 08.2026
Ohne Fix
0
In Angriffen ausgenutzt
5

Verteilung nach Schweregrad

  • Kritisch 11
  • Hoch 36
  • Mittel 25
  • Niedrig 5

Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr

  1. 2018: 8
  2. 2019: 5
  3. 2020: 5
  4. 2021: 3
  5. 2022: 7
  6. 2023: 9
  7. 2024: 7
  8. 2025: 15
  9. 2026: 18
Schweregrad:
  1. HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack dieser Eintrag
    Mittel · 5.3 In Angriffen ausgenutzt CVE-2023-44487 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
  2. Kritisch · 9.8 CVE-2026-65905 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.30, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  3. Kritisch · 9.1 CVE-2026-65182 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0-M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  4. Kritisch · 9.1 CVE-2026-68525 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0-M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  5. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-41284 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  6. Kritisch · 9.8 CVE-2026-43512 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  7. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-43513 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  8. Kritisch · 9.1 CVE-2026-43515 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  9. Hoch · 7.3 CVE-2026-42498 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  10. Kritisch · 9.8 CVE-2026-41293 >= 8.5.0, < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  11. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-34487 >= 9.0.13, < 9.0.117, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.54, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.21 9.0.117, 10.1.54, 11.0.21
  12. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-34483 >= 9.0.40, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.54, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.21 9.0.116, 10.1.54, 11.0.21
  13. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-24880 >= 7.0.0, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.52, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.20 9.0.116, 10.1.52, 11.0.20
  14. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-29129 >= 9.0.114, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.51, < 10.1.53, >= 11.0.16, < 11.0.20 9.0.116, 10.1.53, 11.0.20
  15. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-24734 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.18, >= 10.1.0-M7, < 10.1.52, >= 9.0.83, < 9.0.115 11.0.18, 10.1.52, 9.0.115
  16. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2025-55752 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.11, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.45, >= 9.0.0-M11, < 9.0.109, >= 8.5.6, <= 8.5.100 11.0.11, 10.1.45, 9.0.109
  17. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2025-48989 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.10, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.44, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.108 11.0.10, 10.1.44, 9.0.108
  18. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2025-53506 >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9 9.0.107, 10.1.43, 11.0.9
  19. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2025-52520 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.9, 10.1.43, 9.0.107
  20. Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2025-48988 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.8, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.42, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.106, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.8, 10.1.42, 9.0.106
  21. Kritisch · 9.8 In Angriffen ausgenutzt CVE-2025-24813 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.3, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.35, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.99, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.3, 10.1.35, 9.0.99
Mehr anzeigen (20) 21 von 48 angezeigt

Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung

Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.

Anwendung verbinden
DockRay Newsletter

Anwendungssicherheit in Ihrem Postfach

Wichtige Schwachstellen, konkrete Empfehlungen und praktische Tipps für Ihre Anwendungen. Wählen Sie Ihre Technologien und verfolgen Sie, was für Ihr Projekt relevant ist.

  • Eine tägliche Zusammenfassung neuer Schwachstellen, auch kritischer.
  • Benachrichtigungen über wichtige Updates.
  • Praktische Tipps zur Sicherheit und Überwachung von Anwendungen.

Leer lassen, um Meldungen zu allen Technologien zu erhalten.

Kostenlos anmelden. In jeder E-Mail mit einem Klick abmelden.