Medium

Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority

  • Disclosed: 18.08.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 14:19

Summary

Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur

When ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), POST /api/1/authorities with type=subca never verifies that the caller holds AuthorityPermission on the supplied parent authority. The parent field is resolved by AssociatedAuthoritySchema via a raw fetch_objects(Authority, data) lookup, then passed straight through service.create → mint → cryptography-issuer.create_authority, which loads options["parent"].authority_certificate.private_key and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller's behalf.

Any authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds — including roots they hold no role on — attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.

Affected route

POST /api/1/authorities (with type=subca)

Affected code

Impact

In deployments that set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user — with zero permission on a given internal root CA — can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:

  • Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin.
  • Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.

This converts "can create a self-contained test CA" into "can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation". The ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.

Root cause

AuthoritiesList.post evaluates AuthorityCreatorPermission (a global "may create authorities" flag) and StrictRolePermission, but never evaluates AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles) against the caller-supplied parent. AssociatedAuthoritySchema is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither authorities.service.create nor mint re-check before invoking issuer_plugin.create_authority(options). The bundled cryptography-issuer then uses the parent's stored private key directly.

Validated evidence

Static trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):

  • parent is loaded via AssociatedAuthoritySchema (raw fetch_objects), passed unchecked through views.post → service.create → mint → plugin.create_authority → issue_certificate, where the parent authority's stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.
  • No call to AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...) exists anywhere on this path.
  • Precondition ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False is an explicitly supported config (docs/administration.rst:517).

Proof of concept / reproducer

Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).

Preconditions: ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only; <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID> is any internal cryptography-issuer root CA the attacker holds no role on; <ATTACKER_ROLE> is any role the attacker already belongs to.

bash
curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/authorities" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "name": "attacker-subca",
        "owner": "attacker@example.com",
        "description": "poc",
        "type": "subca",
        "parent": {"id": <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>},
        "plugin": {"slug": "cryptography-issuer"},
        "roles": [{"name": "<ATTACKER_ROLE>"}],
        "commonName": "attacker-intermediate",
        "validityYears": 1
      }'

The response contains a new authority whose authority_certificate is signed by <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>'s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds <ATTACKER_ROLE> on it, so POST /api/1/certificates against the new authority succeeds (and skips allowed_issuance_for_domain because is_private_authority is true).

Static-trace validation command from the source report:

bash
grep -n 'parent' lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \
  && sed -n '37,55p' lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py

Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_022, finding cluster lemur-subca-parent-authz, 5/100 runs).

Suggested fix

In AuthoritiesList.post (or authorities.service.create), when data.get('parent') is present, enforce AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can() before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION. Additionally, update the ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any type=subca creation independent of the global flag.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) lemur < 1.9.3 1.9.3

References

CVSS score 6.5/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-862
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
lemur
Disclosed
18.08.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 14:19

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3677 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: lemur

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (18) in the archive
Total entries
18
First → latest
08.2017 08.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 1
  • High 9
  • Medium 8

Disclosures per year

  1. 2017: 1
  2. 2018: 0
  3. 2019: 0
  4. 2020: 0
  5. 2021: 0
  6. 2022: 0
  7. 2023: 1
  8. 2024: 0
  9. 2025: 0
  10. 2026: 16
Severity:
  1. Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority this entry
    Medium · 6.5 CVE-2026-71317 < 1.9.3 1.9.3
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-30797 < 1.3.2 1.3.2
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2015-7764 < 0.1.5 0.1.5

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.