High

Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks

  • Disclosed: 22.07.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 13:20

Summary

Netty's OcspClient does not validate that the CertificateID in an OCSP response matches the requested CertificateID. A bad actor can replay a GOOD status response issued for an unrelated certificate (by the same CA) to bypass revocation checks for any certificate.

Details

io.netty.handler.ssl.ocsp.OcspClient#validateResponse fails to assert that the CertificateID within the returned BasicOCSPResp matches the original certificate being validated.

When OcspClient.query(...) executes, it builds an OCSP request using the victim certificate's serial number and issuer hash. It then sends this request and receives a response. While the client verifies the signature of the response against the trusted issuer (or a valid responder chain), it never checks the CertificateID inside the response payload.

A bad actor who has access to any other valid, non-revoked certificate issued by the same CA can obtain a legitimately signed OCSP response indicating that the unrelated certificate is GOOD. The bad actor can then return this valid response to the Netty client when it queries the status of any other certificate (e.g., a revoked certificate) issued by the same CA. Because the signature is valid (signed by the CA) and the CertificateID is ignored, the client will incorrectly accept the target certificate as valid.

As per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6960#section-3.2 we have:

Prior to accepting a signed response for a particular certificate as
   valid, OCSP clients SHALL confirm that:

   1. The certificate identified in a received response corresponds to
      the certificate that was identified in the corresponding request;

PoC

The following test case in io.netty.handler.ssl.ocsp.OcspClientTest demonstrates how the implementation accepts a forged OCSP response for a completely unrelated certificate, proving the bypass.

java
    @Test
    void testCertIdBypass() throws Exception {
        X509Bundle caRoot = new CertificateBuilder()
                .algorithm(CertificateBuilder.Algorithm.rsa2048)
                .subject("CN=TrustedRootCA")
                .setIsCertificateAuthority(true)
                .buildSelfSigned();

        GeneralName ocspName = new GeneralName(GeneralName.uniformResourceIdentifier, "http://localhost/");
        AuthorityInformationAccess aia = new AuthorityInformationAccess(new AccessDescription(AccessDescription.id_ad_ocsp, ocspName));
        X509Bundle targetCert = new CertificateBuilder()
                .algorithm(CertificateBuilder.Algorithm.rsa2048)
                .subject("CN=TargetServer")
                .addExtensionOctetString("1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1", false, aia.getEncoded())
                .buildIssuedBy(caRoot);

        X509CertificateHolder caHolder = new JcaX509CertificateHolder(caRoot.getCertificate());
        BasicOCSPResp forgedBasicResp = createBasicOcspResponse(caRoot, new X509CertificateHolder[]{caHolder});
        OCSPResp forgedResponse = new OCSPRespBuilder().build(OCSPRespBuilder.SUCCESSFUL, forgedBasicResp);
        byte[] forgedResponseEncoded = forgedResponse.getEncoded();

        EventLoopGroup group = new MultiThreadIoEventLoopGroup(1, NioIoHandler.newFactory());
        try {
            IoTransport transport = IoTransport.create(group.next(), () -> {
                NioSocketChannel channel = new NioSocketChannel();
                channel.pipeline().addFirst(new ChannelOutboundHandlerAdapter() {
                    @Override
                    public void connect(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, SocketAddress remoteAddress, SocketAddress localAddress, ChannelPromise promise) {
                        promise.setSuccess();

                        ctx.executor().execute(() -> {
                            ctx.pipeline().fireChannelActive();

                            DefaultFullHttpResponse httpResponse = new DefaultFullHttpResponse(
                                    HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpResponseStatus.OK, Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(forgedResponseEncoded));
                            httpResponse.headers().set(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_TYPE, "application/ocsp-response");
                            httpResponse.headers().set(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_LENGTH, httpResponse.content().readableBytes());

                            ctx.pipeline().fireChannelRead(httpResponse);
                        });
                    }
                });
                return channel;
            }, NioDatagramChannel::new);

            DnsNameResolver resolver = OcspServerCertificateValidator.createDefaultResolver(transport);
            Promise<BasicOCSPResp> promise = OcspClient.query(targetCert.getCertificate(), caRoot.getCertificate(), false, transport, resolver);

            promise.await();

            assertFalse(promise.isSuccess(),
                    "Netty incorrectly accepted the response for the unrelated certificate. The CertificateID was ignored!");
        } finally {
            group.shutdownGracefully();
        }
    }

Impact

Certificate Validation Bypass. Any application using Netty's OcspClient to check certificate revocation status is impacted.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) io.netty:netty-handler-ssl-ocsp >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final, < 4.1.136.Final 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final

References

CVSS score 7.4/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-295
Platform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Package
io.netty:netty-handler-ssl-ocsp
Disclosed
22.07.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 13:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: io.netty:netty-handler-ssl-ocsp

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

Total entries
3
First → latest
07.2026 07.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • High 3

Disclosures per year

  1. 2026: 3
  1. High · 7.4 CVE-2026-56822 >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final, < 4.1.136.Final 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final
  2. High · 7.4 CVE-2026-56821 >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final, < 4.1.136.Final 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final
  3. Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks this entry
    High · 7.4 CVE-2026-56820 >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final, < 4.1.136.Final 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.