js-toml has silent type confusion via falsy-primitive duplicate-key bypass
Summary
js-toml's interpreter checks whether a key already exists in a parser-built container with if (object[key]) instead of if (key in object). When the prior value is a falsy primitive — false, 0, 0n, 0.0, -0, or "" — the duplicate-key branch is skipped and the value is silently overwritten by a later sub-table, dotted-key sub-table, or array-of-tables sharing the same name. Per the TOML 1.0.0 spec ("Defining a key multiple times is invalid"; "You cannot define any key or table more than once"), this should be a parse error.
The result is structural type confusion of attacker-named keys in the value returned by load(). A boolean-typed false (or numeric 0) becomes a truthy object. Host applications that gate behavior on if (config.flag), if (!user.banned), if (config.allowDelete), or if (config.publicMode) will silently take the truthy branch.
This is distinct from GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2 (the 1.0.2 prototype-pollution fix). Object.prototype is not polluted. The Object.create(null) mitigation from 1.0.2 is intact; the bug here is in the duplicate-key state machine, not in container construction.
Details
Two truthy checks are wrong:
src/load/interpreter.ts:214 — Interpreter.tryCreatingObject
if (object[key]) { // falsy primitives slip through
// duplicate-key logic
} else {
object[key] = createSafeObject(); // silently overwrites the prior falsy value
...
}
src/load/interpreter.ts:278 — Interpreter.getOrCreateArray
if (object[first] && !Array.isArray(object[first])) { // same flaw
throw new DuplicateKeyError();
}
object[first] = object[first] || []; // overwrites the prior falsy value
Both should use the in operator. Containers are created via Object.create(null), so in is unambiguous (no inherited keys to worry about).
The bug is reachable through every parent-walking interpreter path:
assignValue— dotted keys inkey = valuecreateTable—[stdTable]headersgetOrCreateArray—[[arrayOfTables]]headers
PoC
isAdmin = false
[isAdmin]
forced = "yes"
import { load } from 'js-toml';
const config = load(`
isAdmin = false
[isAdmin]
forced = "yes"
`);
console.log(JSON.stringify(config));
// {"isAdmin":{"forced":"yes"}}
console.log(config.isAdmin ? 'BYPASS' : 'safe');
// BYPASS
if (config.isAdmin) {
// attacker reaches admin-only code
}
Impact
Spec-violating input acceptance leading to structural type confusion. (CWE-697)
Suggested fix
in src/load/interpreter.ts
export class Interpreter extends BaseCstVisitor {
ignoreImplicitDeclared,
ignoreExplicitDeclared
) {
- if (object[key]) {
+ if (key in object) {
if (
!isPlainObject(object[key]) ||
(!ignoreExplicitDeclared &&
export class Interpreter extends BaseCstVisitor {
return this.getOrCreateArray(keys, object[first], idx + 1);
}
- if (object[first] && !Array.isArray(object[first])) {
+ if (first in object && !Array.isArray(object[first])) {
throw new DuplicateKeyError();
}
object[first] = object[first] || [];
Affected software
Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.
| Platform | Package | Vulnerable versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm package | js-toml | < 1.1.2 | 1.1.2 |
References
- CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N- Weakness (CWE)
CWE-697- Platform
- npm
- Package
js-toml- Disclosed
- 26.06.2026
- Updated
- 11.10.2026 10:22
Sources and licenses
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-m34p-749j-x6m6 - CC BY 4.0
Vulnerability history: js-toml
All published vulnerabilities of this package (npm package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.
- Total entries
- 3
- First → latest
- 08.2025 06.2026
- Without a fix
- 0
- Exploited in attacks
- 0
Severity breakdown
- High 2
- Medium 1
Disclosures per year
- 2025: 1
- 2026: 2
-
js-toml has silent type confusion via falsy-primitive duplicate-key bypass this entry
Know which vulnerabilities affect your application
With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.