wger has Broken Access Control in Global Gym Configuration Update Endpoint
Summary
wger exposes a global configuration edit endpoint at /config/gym-config/edit implemented by GymConfigUpdateView. The view declares permission_required = 'config.change_gymconfig' but does not enforce it because it inherits WgerFormMixin (ownership-only checks) instead of the project’s permission-enforcing mixin (WgerPermissionMixin) .
The edited object is a singleton (GymConfig(pk=1)) and the model does not implement get_owner_object(), so WgerFormMixin skips ownership enforcement. As a result, a low-privileged authenticated user can modify installation-wide configuration and trigger server-side side effects in GymConfig.save().
This is a vertical privilege escalation from a regular user to privileged global configuration control. The application explicitly declares permission_required = 'config.change_gymconfig', demonstrating that the action is intended to be restricted; however, this requirement is never enforced at runtime.
Affected endpoint
The config URLs map as follows.
File: wger/config/urls.py
patterns_gym_config = [
path('edit', gym_config.GymConfigUpdateView.as_view(), name='edit'),
]
urlpatterns = [
path(
'gym-config/',
include((patterns_gym_config, 'gym_config'), namespace='gym_config'),
),
]
This resolves to:
/config/gym-config/edit
Root cause
The view declares a permission but does not enforce it
File: wger/config/views/gym_config.py
class GymConfigUpdateView(WgerFormMixin, UpdateView):
model = GymConfig
fields = ('default_gym',)
permission_required = 'config.change_gymconfig'
success_url = reverse_lazy('gym:gym:list')
title = gettext_lazy('Edit')
def get_object(self):
return GymConfig.objects.get(pk=1)
The permission string exists, but WgerFormMixin does not check permission_required.
The project’s permission mixin exists but is not used
File: wger/utils/generic_views.py
class WgerPermissionMixin:
permission_required = False
login_required = False
def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
if self.login_required or self.permission_required:
if not request.user.is_authenticated:
return HttpResponseRedirect(
reverse_lazy('core:user:login') + f'?next={request.path}'
)
if self.permission_required:
has_permission = False
if isinstance(self.permission_required, tuple):
for permission in self.permission_required:
if request.user.has_perm(permission):
has_permission = True
elif request.user.has_perm(self.permission_required):
has_permission = True
if not has_permission:
return HttpResponseForbidden('You are not allowed to access this object')
return super(WgerPermissionMixin, self).dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)
GymConfigUpdateView does not inherit this mixin, so none of the login/permission logic runs.
The mixin that is used performs only ownership checks, and GymConfig has no owner
File: wger/utils/generic_views.py
class WgerFormMixin(ModelFormMixin):
def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
self.kwargs = kwargs
self.request = request
if self.owner_object:
owner_object = self.owner_object['class'].objects.get(pk=kwargs[self.owner_object['pk']])
else:
try:
owner_object = self.get_object().get_owner_object()
except AttributeError:
owner_object = False
if owner_object and owner_object.user != self.request.user:
return HttpResponseForbidden('You are not allowed to access this object')
return super(WgerFormMixin, self).dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)
File: wger/config/models/gym_config.py
class GymConfig(models.Model):
default_gym = models.ForeignKey(
Gym,
verbose_name=_('Default gym'),
# ...
null=True,
blank=True,
on_delete=models.CASCADE,
)
# No get_owner_object() method
Because GymConfig does not implement get_owner_object(), WgerFormMixin catches AttributeError and sets owner_object = False, skipping any access restriction.
Security impact
This is not a cosmetic setting: GymConfig.save() performs installation-wide side effects.
File: wger/config/models/gym_config.py
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
if self.default_gym:
UserProfile.objects.filter(gym=None).update(gym=self.default_gym)
for profile in UserProfile.objects.filter(gym=self.default_gym):
user = profile.user
if not is_any_gym_admin(user):
try:
user.gymuserconfig
except GymUserConfig.DoesNotExist:
config = GymUserConfig()
config.gym = self.default_gym
config.user = user
config.save()
return super(GymConfig, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
On deployments with multiple gyms, this allows a low-privileged user to tamper with tenant assignment defaults, affecting new registrations and bulk-updating existing users lacking a gym. This permits unauthorized modification of installation-wide state and bulk updates to other users’ records, violating the intended administrative trust boundary.
Proof of concept (local verification)
Environment: local docker compose stack, accessed via http://127.0.0.1:8088/en/.
Observed behavior
An unauthenticated user can reach the endpoint via GET; POST requires authentication and redirects to login.
An authenticated low-privileged user can submit the form and change the global singleton. After the save, the application redirects to success_url = reverse_lazy('gym:gym:list') (e.g. /en/gym/list), which is permission-protected; therefore the browser may display a “Forbidden” page even though the global update already succeeded.
DB evidence (before/after)
Before submission:
default_gym_id= None
profiles_gym_null= 1
After a low-privileged user submitted the form setting default_gym to gym id 1:
default_gym_id= 1
profiles_gym_null= 0
Recommended fix
Ensure permission enforcement runs before the form dispatch.
Using the project mixin (order matters):
class GymConfigUpdateView(WgerPermissionMixin, WgerFormMixin, UpdateView):
permission_required = 'config.change_gymconfig'
login_required = True
Alternatively, use Django’s PermissionRequiredMixin (and LoginRequiredMixin) directly.
Conclusion
The view explicitly declares permission_required = 'config.change_gymconfig', which demonstrates developer intent that this action be restricted. The fact that it is not enforced constitutes improper access control regardless of perceived business impact.
<img width="1912" height="578" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-27 230752" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c627b404-6d9c-4477-88bd-f867d0fa09d2" />Affected software
Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.
| Platform | Package | Vulnerable versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | wger | <= 2.1 | no fix |
References
- https://github.com/wger-project/wger/security/advisories/GHSA-xppv-4jrx-qf8m
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40474
- https://github.com/wger-project/wger/commit/47ee5af93b3ced24b9f94b0a8b9296b50bc9523f
- https://github.com/wger-project/wger
- https://github.com/wger-project/wger/releases/tag/2.5
- https://pypi.org/project/wger
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xppv-4jrx-qf8m
- CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L- Weakness (CWE)
CWE-284, CWE-862- Platform
- Python (PyPI)
- Package
wger- Disclosed
- 16.04.2026
- Updated
- 11.10.2026 14:17
Sources and licenses
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3424 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-xppv-4jrx-qf8m - CC BY 4.0
Vulnerability history: wger
All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.
- Total entries
- 20
- First → latest
- 11.2022 10.2026
- Without a fix
- 16
- Exploited in attacks
- 0
Severity breakdown
- Critical 2
- High 8
- Medium 9
- Low 1
Disclosures per year
- 2022: 1
- 2023: 2
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 17
-
wger has Broken Access Control in Global Gym Configuration Update Endpoint this entry
Know which vulnerabilities affect your application
With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.