High

Craft CMS has Cloud Metadata SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS Rebinding

  • Disclosed: 23.02.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

The SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation performs DNS resolution separately from the HTTP request. This Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability enables DNS rebinding attacks, where an attacker’s DNS server returns different IP addresses for validation compared to the actual request.

This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437 (GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc) that allows access to all blocked IPs, not just IPv6 endpoints.

Severity

Bypass of cloud metadata SSRF protection for all blocked IPs

Required Permissions

Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for:

  • Edit assets in the <VolumeName> volume
  • Create assets in the <VolumeName> volume

These permissions may be granted to:

  • Authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access
  • Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions)

Technical Details

Vulnerable Code Flow

The code at src/gql/resolvers/mutations/Asset.php performs two separate DNS lookups:

php
// VALIDATION PHASE: First DNS resolution at time T1
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);  // DNS Lookup #1 - Returns safe IP

    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254',   // AWS, GCP, Azure IMDS
        '169.254.170.2',     // AWS ECS metadata
        '100.100.100.200',   // Alibaba Cloud
        '192.0.0.192',       // Oracle Cloud
    ])) {
        return false;  // Check passes - IP looks safe
    }
    return true;
}

// ... time gap between validation and request ...

// REQUEST PHASE: Second DNS resolution at time T2 (inside Guzzle)
$response = $client->get($url);  // DNS Lookup #2 - Guzzle resolves DNS AGAIN
                                  // Now returns 169.254.169.254!

Root Cause

Two separate DNS lookups occur:

  1. Validation: gethostbyname() in validateHostname()
  2. Request: Guzzle's internal DNS resolution via libcurl

An attacker controlling a DNS server can return different IPs for each query.

Bypass Mechanism

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Attacker's DNS Server: evil.attacker.com                                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 1 (Validation - T1):                                                  |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 1.2.3.4 (safe IP, TTL: 0)                                       |
|   Result:   Validation PASSES                                               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 2 (Guzzle Request - T2):                                              |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 169.254.169.254 (metadata IP, TTL: 0)                           |
|   Result:   Request goes to blocked IP -> CREDENTIALS STOLEN                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Target Endpoints via DNS Rebinding

DNS rebinding allows access to all blocked IPs:

Target Rebind To Impact
AWS IMDS 169.254.169.254 IAM credentials, instance identity
AWS ECS 169.254.170.2 Container credentials
GCP Metadata 169.254.169.254 Service account tokens
Azure Metadata 169.254.169.254 Managed identity tokens
Alibaba Cloud 100.100.100.200 Instance credentials
Oracle Cloud 192.0.0.192 Instance metadata
Internal Services 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x Internal APIs, databases

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker sets up DNS server with alternating responses
  2. Attacker sends mutation with url: "http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/"
  3. First DNS query returns safe IP (e.g., 1.2.3.4) → validation passes
  4. Second DNS query returns metadata IP (169.254.169.254) → request to metadata
  5. Attacker retrieves credentials from ANY cloud provider
  6. Attacker can now achieve code execution by creating new instances with their SSH key

Remediation

Fix: DNS Pinning with CURLOPT_RESOLVE

Pin the DNS resolution - use the same resolved IP for both validation and request:

php
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);

    // Resolve once
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

    // Validate the resolved IP
    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254', '169.254.170.2',
        '100.100.100.200', '192.0.0.192',
    ])) {
        return false;
    }

    // Store for later use
    $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] = $ip;

    return true;
}

// When making the request - CRITICAL: Use pinned IP
protected function makeRequest(string $url): ResponseInterface
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] ?? null;

    $options = [];
    if ($ip) {
        // Force Guzzle/curl to use the SAME IP we validated
        $options['curl'] = [
            CURLOPT_RESOLVE => [
                "$hostname:80:$ip",
                "$hostname:443:$ip"
            ]
        ];
    }

    return $this->client->get($url, $options);
}

Alternative: Single Resolution with Immediate Use

php
// Resolve to IP and use IP directly in URL
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

if (in_array($ip, $blockedIPs)) {
    return false;
}

// Make request directly to IP with Host header
$client->get("http://$ip" . parse_url($url, PHP_URL_PATH), [
    'headers' => [
        'Host' => $hostname
    ]
]);

Additional Mitigations

Mitigation Description
DNS Pinning (CURLOPT_RESOLVE) Force same IP for validation and request
Single IP-based request Use resolved IP directly in URL
Implement IMDSv2 Requires token header (infrastructure-level)
Network egress filtering Block metadata IPs at network level

Resources

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Composer package craftcms/cms >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.23, >= 3.5.0, < 4.16.19 5.8.23, 4.16.19

References

CVSS score -
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-367
Platform
Composer
Package
craftcms/cms
Disclosed
23.02.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 10:22

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: craftcms/cms

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Composer package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (127) in the archive
Total entries
127
First → latest
07.2021 08.2026
Without a fix
6
Exploited in attacks
4

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 9
  • High 41
  • Medium 65
  • Low 12

Disclosures per year

  1. 2021: 3
  2. 2022: 22
  3. 2023: 13
  4. 2024: 9
  5. 2025: 6
  6. 2026: 74
Severity:
  1. Critical CVE-2026-72780 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.10.5 5.10.5
  2. High CVE-2026-72781 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.10.7, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.18.3 5.10.7, 4.18.3
  3. High CVE-2026-72778 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.10.6, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.18.2 5.10.6, 4.18.2
  4. High CVE-2026-55790 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.23, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.16 5.9.23, 4.17.16
  5. High CVE-2026-50282 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.21, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.14 5.9.21, 4.17.14
  6. High CVE-2026-50284 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.22, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.15 5.9.22, 4.17.15
  7. Critical CVE-2026-55791 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.10, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.18 5.10, 4.18
  8. High CVE-2026-44011 >= 4.0.0, < 4.17.12, >= 5.0.0, < 5.9.18 4.17.12, 5.9.18
  9. High CVE-2026-44010 >= 5.0.0, < 5.9.18, >= 4.0.0, < 4.17.12 5.9.18, 4.17.12
  10. High CVE-2026-32267 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.6, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.12 4.17.6, 5.9.12
  11. High CVE-2026-32264 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.5, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.11 4.17.5, 5.9.11
  12. High CVE-2026-32263 >= 5.6.0, < 5.9.11 5.9.11
  13. High CVE-2026-31857 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.9, >= 4.0.0-beta.1, < 4.17.4 5.9.9, 4.17.4
  14. High CVE-2026-31858 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.9 5.9.9
  15. High CVE-2026-29069 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.2, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.2 5.9.0-beta.2, 4.17.0-beta.2
  16. Critical CVE-2026-28697 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1 5.9.0-beta.1, 4.17.0-beta.1
  17. High CVE-2026-28696 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1 4.17.0-beta.1, 5.9.0-beta.1
  18. Craft CMS has Cloud Metadata SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS Rebinding this entry
    High CVE-2026-27127 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.23, >= 3.5.0, < 4.16.19 5.8.23, 4.16.19
  19. High CVE-2026-25498 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.22, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.16.18 5.8.22, 4.16.18
  20. High CVE-2026-25497 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1 5.9.0-beta.1, 4.17.0-beta.1
  21. High CVE-2026-25495 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.22, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.16.18 5.8.22, 4.16.18
  22. High CVE-2025-68455 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.21, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.16.17 5.8.21, 4.16.17
  23. High CVE-2025-68456 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.21, >= 3.0.0, < 4.16.17 5.8.21, 4.16.17
  24. High CVE-2025-46731 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.14.13, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.6.15 4.14.13, 5.6.15
  25. Critical · 10.0 Exploited in attacks CVE-2025-32432 >= 3.0.0-RC1, < 3.9.15, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.14.15, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.6.17 3.9.15, 4.14.15, 5.6.17
  26. High · 8.0 Exploited in attacks CVE-2025-23209 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.5.8, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.13.8 5.5.8, 4.13.8
  27. Critical · 9.8 Exploited in attacks CVE-2024-56145 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.5.2, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.13.2, >= 3.0.0, < 3.9.14 5.5.2, 4.13.2, 3.9.14
  28. High · 7.2 CVE-2024-52293 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.12.2, >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.4.3 4.12.2, 5.4.3
  29. High · 7.7 CVE-2024-52292 >= 5.0.0-alpha.1, < 5.4.9, >= 3.5.13, < 4.12.8 5.4.9, 4.12.8
  30. High · 8.4 CVE-2024-52291 >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.4.6, >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.12.5 5.4.6, 4.12.5
  31. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2024-37843 <= 3.7.31 no fix
  32. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-36260 < 4.6.2 4.6.2
  33. Critical · 10.0 CVE-2023-41892 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.4.15 4.4.15
  34. High · 7.2 CVE-2023-40035 >= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.4.15, >= 3.0.0, < 3.8.15 4.4.15, 3.8.15
  35. High · 7.2 CVE-2023-32679 >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.6 4.4.6
  36. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-37783 >= 3.0.0, < 3.7.33 3.7.33
  37. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-15929 < 3.1.7 3.1.7
  38. High · 7.2 CVE-2018-20465 <= 3.0.34 no fix
  39. High · 8.8 CVE-2018-3814 <= 2.6.3000 no fix
  40. High · 8.8 CVE-2022-29933 < 3.7.36 3.7.36
  41. High · 8.8 CVE-2021-41824 >= 3.4.0, < 3.7.14 3.7.14
  42. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2021-27903 < 3.6.7 3.6.7

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.