Mistune block_parser: quadratic-time parsing on long lists of repeated reference-link definitions
Summary
Type: Algorithmic-complexity DoS in reference-link definition handling. A markdown document with N reference-link definitions of the same key (or many distinct keys) takes O(N²) parser time. 5000 repeated [a]: u\n definitions take ~1.1 second; 10000 → ~4.5 seconds.
File: src/mistune/block_parser.py (reference-link def parsing) and the surrounding ref_links env-dictionary handling.
Root cause: every reference definition is parsed by scanning forward from each candidate position. The unikey normalisation runs per-def, the dictionary insert is per-def, and the lookup-by-label-then-iterate-defs path is linear in the number of stored defs. For input with N defs, the total work is O(N²).
Affected Code
src/mistune/block_parser.py — reference-definition rule fires on every line that matches [label]: url. For each one:
unikey(label)is called (linear scan of the label).- The def is appended to
state.env['ref_links']. - Later inline-link resolution looks up by
unikey(label)in the dict (O(1)) but the surrounding parser revisits the def list for paragraph-vs-def disambiguation.
The cumulative parse time grows as the square of the number of defs.
Why it's wrong: the parser does not amortise the def-list scan. A single forward pass with a hash-keyed dict (already in place) plus a per-line classifier should make this O(N).
Exploit Chain
- Application uses mistune to render attacker-supplied markdown. No plugins required.
- Attacker submits a 35 KB document of
[a]: u\nrepeated 5000 times followed by[click][a]. - CPU pegs for ~1.1 seconds. 10000 defs → ~4.5 s. 20000 → ~18 s. Doubling input quadruples time.
Security Impact
Attacker capability: small input → large CPU. Predictable scaling. Can be repeated.
Preconditions: application uses mistune.create_markdown() (default config) on attacker-supplied markdown. Worth noting: the ref_links dictionary persists for the lifetime of the parse, so a long document with many defs builds up memory; with N defs of attacker-chosen length, the per-def normalisation cost compounds.
Differential: PoC-verified against mistune@3.2.1, default config:
import mistune, time
md = mistune.create_markdown()
for n in [1000, 2000, 5000, 10000]:
s = '[a]: u\n' * n + '[click][a]'
t = time.time()
md(s)
print(f' ref defs * {n} ({len(s)}b): {(time.time() - t) * 1000:.0f}ms')
# Output (Python 3.13, Linux, 2.5GHz CPU):
# ref defs * 1000 ( 7012b): 46ms
# ref defs * 2000 (14012b): 186ms
# ref defs * 5000 (35012b): 1121ms
# ref defs * 10000 (70012b): 4400ms
The patched build (with the surrounding parser amortised to O(N)) keeps the time linear.
Suggested Fix
Replace the per-def re-scan with a single forward pass that classifies each line into ref_def | paragraph | other once and only inserts into ref_links once per def. The dict already exists; the wasted work is in the surrounding scan loop, not in the dict operations.
A regression test asserting that md('[a]: u\n' * 50_000 + '[click][a]') completes in under 1 second would catch any regression.
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | mistune | < 3.3.0 | 3.3.0 |
Odnośniki
- https://github.com/lepture/mistune/releases/tag/v3.3.0
- https://github.com/lepture/mistune/commit/2b04d7ba341c16ac78fe82d3076bdd5c3de87c69
- https://github.com/lepture/mistune/security/advisories/GHSA-ffq3-xpv3-j92q
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59928
- https://github.com/lepture/mistune
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mistune/PYSEC-2026-2216.yaml
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-1333, CWE-407- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
mistune- Ujawniono
- 08.07.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 14:18
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2216 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-ffq3-xpv3-j92q - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: mistune
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 20
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 10.2017 09.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 1
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Wysoka 7
- Średnia 13
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2017: 2
- 2018: 0
- 2019: 0
- 2020: 0
- 2021: 0
- 2022: 1
- 2023: 0
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 17
-
Mistune block_parser: quadratic-time parsing on long lists of repeated reference-link definitions ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.