Średnia

Tornado: Unbounded query-string argument count allows event-loop-stalling DoS

  • Ujawniono: 30.09.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 15:18

Summary

HTTPServerRequest.__init__ in tornado/httputil.py parses the URL query string via parse_qs_bytes() with no field-count limit — while the sibling POST-body parsing path (parse_body_arguments) received a max_num_fields=1000 cap added earlier in this exact same release (v6.5.8, commit 8d6363ed), explicitly to bound parsing cost for the identical underlying primitive. This leaves the query-string path with the resource-exhaustion exposure the body-path fix was meant to close.

File: tornado/httputil.py, line 553 (HTTPServerRequest.__init__)

Root Cause

python
# tornado/httputil.py:553 (before fix)
self.arguments = parse_qs_bytes(self.query, keep_blank_values=True)

Compare with the POST-body path fixed one commit earlier in the same release:

python
# tornado/httputil.py:1038-1041
uri_arguments = parse_qs_bytes(
    body,
    keep_blank_values=True,
    max_num_fields=config.urlencoded.max_arguments,  # default 1000
)

Both call sites funnel through the same tornado.escape.parse_qs_bytes (a thin wrapper over urllib.parse.parse_qs), which is exactly why max_num_fields was added to urllib.parse.parse_qsl upstream — to let frameworks bound field count. The fix was applied only to the body path; the query-string path was missed.

The request line + headers together are capped at max_header_size (default 65536 bytes), so this is not literally unbounded, but a single ~64KB request line can carry thousands of short key=value pairs — far beyond the 1000-field limit the maintainer judged appropriate for the structurally identical body case.

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker sends a GET request whose query string is packed with thousands of short fields (e.g. k0=1&k1=1&...&k7799=1, ~61KB), fitting comfortably under max_header_size. No authentication, cookies, or prior state required.
  2. Tornado accepts and parses this with no field-count cap, unlike the equivalent POST-body request (which is correctly rejected with 400 once >1000 fields are present).
  3. Parsing thousands of fields is CPU work performed synchronously inside Tornado's single-threaded IOLoop. Several such requests in flight concurrently stall the event loop, delaying processing of all other connections on that loop — not just the attacker's own request.

Verification (dynamic, local reproduction against v6.5.8)

Ran the unmodified v6.5.8 source directly (no external dependencies needed) with a minimal tornado.web.Application on 127.0.0.1:8888.

  • Identical 7800-field/~61KB payload sent as GET query string → 200 OK; sent as POST body (application/x-www-form-urlencoded) → 400 Bad Request (correctly rejected by the existing max_num_fields body-path limit). This confirms the asymmetry directly.
  • Per-request parse cost: baseline (/?a=1) averaged 1.86ms; the 7800-field query string averaged 25.1ms (~13x).
  • Event-loop-blocking amplification (raw-socket test, isolating server-side stall from client overhead): with 10 sequential baseline probe requests fired with no load, average latency was 1.47ms (max 5.9ms). With 5 concurrent 61KB/7800-field requests in flight, the same baseline probes averaged 13.0ms (max 118.1ms) — an 8.9x average slowdown for unrelated clients, produced by ~305KB of unauthenticated attacker traffic.

Impact

All Tornado servers/applications are affected — this triggers on every request with a query string, independent of application/handler logic. An unauthenticated, unprivileged remote attacker can measurably degrade response times for all other clients sharing the same IOLoop, using a small amount of bandwidth and no special conditions. This is an availability/DoS concern; no confidentiality or integrity impact.

Recommended Fix

python
# tornado/httputil.py — HTTPServerRequest.__init__
if uri is not None:
    self.path, sep, self.query = uri.partition("?")
try:
    self.arguments = parse_qs_bytes(
        self.query,
        keep_blank_values=True,
        max_num_fields=_DEFAULT_PARSE_BODY_CONFIG.urlencoded.max_arguments,
    )
except ValueError as e:
    raise HTTPInputError("Invalid query string: %s" % e) from e

This reuses the existing ParseUrlEncodedConfig.max_arguments default (1000) via the module's _DEFAULT_PARSE_BODY_CONFIG, matching the POST-body limit and honoring any global override via set_parse_body_config(). The try/except is necessary because — unlike parse_body_arguments, which already wraps its call and converts ValueError into a clean HTTPInputError/400 — the query-string call site currently has no such handling, so without it, a request exceeding the limit would raise an uncaught ValueError instead of a clean 400.

Verified: with the fix applied, requests with ≤1000 query-string fields are unaffected; requests with >1000 fields are rejected with 400 Bad Request (consistent with the POST-body behavior); Tornado's own httputil_test and web_test suites (256 tests) pass unchanged.

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Python (PyPI) tornado < 6.5.9 6.5.9

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS 5.3/10
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-770
Platforma
Python (PyPI)
Paczka
tornado
Ujawniono
30.09.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 15:18

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-3hv7-mjh2-fv65 - CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: tornado

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkie (23) w archiwum
Wszystkich wpisów
23
Pierwsza → ostatnia
05.2012 09.2026
Bez poprawki
0
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Wysoka 13
  • Średnia 8
  • Niska 2

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2017: 0
  2. 2018: 0
  3. 2019: 0
  4. 2020: 1
  5. 2021: 0
  6. 2022: 0
  7. 2023: 2
  8. 2024: 3
  9. 2025: 4
  10. 2026: 12

wcześniej: 1

Istotność:
  1. Tornado: Unbounded query-string argument count allows event-loop-stalling DoS ten wpis
    Średnia · 5.3 CVE-2026-103261 < 6.5.9 6.5.9
  2. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2026-31958 < 6.5.5 6.5.5
  3. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2025-67726 < 6.5.3 6.5.3
  4. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2025-67725 < 6.5.3 6.5.3
  5. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2024-52804 < 6.4.2 6.4.2

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.