Keylime registrar and (untrusted) Agent can be bypassed by an attacker
Impact
A security issue was found in the Keylime registrar code which allows an attacker to effectively bypass the challenge-response protocol used to verify that an agent has indeed access to an AIK which in indeed related to the EK.
When an agent starts up, it will contact a registrar and provide a public EK and public AIK, in addition to the EK Certificate. This registrar will then challenge the agent to decrypt a challenge encrypted with the EK.
When receiving the wrong "auth_tag" back from the agent during activation, the registrar answers with an error message that contains the expected correct "auth_tag" (an HMAC which is calculated within the registrar for checking). An attacker could simply record the correct expected "auth_tag" from the HTTP error message and perform the activate call again with the correct expected "auth_tag" for the agent.
The security issue allows an attacker to pass the challenge-response protocol during registration with (almost) arbitrary registration data. In particular, the attacker can provide a valid EK Certificate and EK, which passes verification by the tenant (or registrar), while using a compromised AIK, which is stored unprotected outside the TPM and is unrelated to former two. The attacker then deliberately fails the initial activation call to get to know the correct "auth_tag" and then provides it in a subsequent activation call. This results in an agent which is (incorrectly) registered with a valid EK Certificate, but with a compromised/unrelated AIK.
Patches
Users should upgrade to release 7.5.0
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | keylime | < 7.5.0 | 7.5.0 |
Odnośniki
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-38201
- https://github.com/keylime/keylime/security/advisories/GHSA-f4r5-q63f-gcww
- https://github.com/keylime/keylime/commit/9e5ac9f25cd400b16d5969f531cee28290543f2a
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222693
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38201
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5080
- https://github.com/keylime/keylime
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/keylime/PYSEC-2023-160.yaml
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZIZZB5NHNCS5D2AEH3ZAO6OQC72IK7WS
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-639- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
keylime- Ujawniono
- 25.08.2023
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 13:19
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2023-160 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-f4r5-q63f-gcww - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: keylime
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 9
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 05.2022 05.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 1
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Krytyczna 2
- Wysoka 4
- Średnia 2
- Niska 1
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2022: 2
- 2023: 3
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 2
- 2026: 2
-
Keylime registrar and (untrusted) Agent can be bypassed by an attacker ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.