Alta

pyload-ng: getUserData/get_userdata exposed at Perms.ANY allow any authenticated account to brute-force the administrator password

  • Publicada: 09.10.2026
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 15:18

Summary

Api.getUserData (legacy) and Api.get_userdata are declared with @permission(Perms.ANY) and are reachable at /api/getUserData and /api/get_userdata. Because Perms.ANY == 0 and pyLoad's permission check is a bitmask AND, that gate is a no-op: every authenticated account passes, including one holding zero permission bits.

Both methods are thin wrappers around check_auth(), which the maintainers deliberately restricted to administrators by omitting @permission (no entry in perm_map, so is_authorized() returns False for non-admins). The wrappers undo that protection.

An attacker holding the lowest-privileged account in the system therefore has a clean binary oracle on the administrator password, with no account lockout anywhere in the codebase, and with the 100 req/min rate limiter bypassable by rotating X-Forwarded-For.

Affected code

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1446 and :1464

python
    #: Old API
    @permission(Perms.ANY)
    @get
    def getUserData(self, username: str, password: str) -> OldUserData:
        """
        similar to `check_auth` but returns UserData type.
        """
        user = self.check_auth(username, password)
        ...

    @permission(Perms.ANY)
    @get
    def get_userdata(self, username: str, password: str) -> UserData:
        user = self.check_auth(username, password)
        ...

Root cause

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:57

python
class Perms(IntFlag):
    ANY = 0  #: requires no permission, but login

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:108

python
def has_permission(user_perms: Perms, required_perms: Perms):
    return required_perms == (user_perms & required_perms)

For required_perms == 0 this evaluates to 0 == (user_perms & 0) → 0 == 0 → always True. The @permission(Perms.ANY) gate therefore admits every authenticated principal regardless of which permission bits they hold.

Contrast with the intended admin-only primitive, src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1396:

python
    @legacy("checkAuth")
    @get
    def check_auth(self, username: str, password: str) -> dict[str, Any]:

check_auth has no @permission; is_authorized() at api/__init__.py:1430 returns False for non-admins. The two wrappers carry Perms.ANY and restore access for everyone.

Because both wrappers also carry @get, they are placed in method_map and are directly routable via /api/<func>.

Amplifiers

1. No lockout. There is no failed-login counter, delay, or ban anywhere in the codebase. A failed guess costs the attacker only one PBKDF2 computation.

2. Rate limiting is bypassable. /api/* applies rate_limit(count=100, period=60) (src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/api_blueprint.py:25), which buckets on a fully client-controlled header (src/pyload/webui/app/helpers.py:446):

python
client_ip = flask.request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-For", "").split(",")[0].strip() \
    or flask.request.remote_addr

Rotating X-Forwarded-For per request yields a fresh bucket each time. Notably, is_loopback_request() in the same file (helpers.py:288-294) explicitly treats the presence of X-Forwarded-For / X-Real-IP / Forwarded as untrustworthy — the same guard was evidently not applied inside rate_limit().

Impact

Online brute force of the administrator account leading to full administrative takeover. A successful response additionally discloses the target account's id, name, email, role, and permission bits.

Proof of concept

Verified against 0.5.0b3, commit a5b008958.

Setup: stock instance with admin pyload, plus a non-admin user bob created with role=USER and permission=0.

Step 1 — establish that bob is genuinely unprivileged:

GET /api/checkAuth?username=pyload&password=pyload   ->  401 {"error": "Access denied"}
GET /api/getAllUserData                              ->  401 {"error": "Access denied"}

Step 2 — the flaw. Same user, same session, Perms.ANY gate:

GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=WRONG
  -> 200 {"name": null, "email": null, "role": null, "permission": null, "template_name": null}

GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=pyload
  -> 200 {"name": "pyload", "email": "", "role": 0, "permission": 0, "template_name": "default"}

role: 0 is Role.ADMIN. get_userdata behaves identically. This is a perfect yes/no oracle.

Step 3 — measured brute force and recovery. Run as bob (permission = 0), admin password set to a 2-character value, X-Forwarded-For rotated on every request:

attempts         : 667
elapsed          : 39.7s   (16.8 guesses/sec)
429 rate-limits  : 0
account lockout  : NONE - same session authenticated throughout
RECOVERED SECRET : 'zq'   (true value 'zq')   match=True

Step 4 — full takeover with the recovered secret:

POST /login as pyload/<recovered>       ->  HTTP 302  (authenticated as admin)
GET  /api/getAllUserData (admin-only)  ->  HTTP 200  (full user dump)

Measured throughput is 17-47 guesses/sec/thread. The only bound is PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 at 100,000 iterations in src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:14, not any rate limit.

Suggested remediation

  • Remove @permission(Perms.ANY) from getUserData and get_userdata, or drop them entirely — they are legacy compatibility shims, and modern callers already use the admin-only check_auth.
  • Structurally: Perms.ANY = 0 makes has_permission() vacuous, so any method decorated @permission(Perms.ANY) silently becomes public to every logged-in user. Give ANY a real bit value, or handle it explicitly in has_permission() as "requires an authenticated session".
  • Do not trust X-Forwarded-For unless a trusted-proxy deployment is explicitly configured. Otherwise bucket rate_limit() on request.remote_addr, or add the same guard is_loopback_request() already uses.
  • Add per-account failed-authentication throttling or lockout.
  • Consider hmac.compare_digest() in _check_password() (src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:61 uses a plain == on the derived hash, contradicting the "always use compare_digest" guidance two files away).

Notes for triage

There is no 0.5.0b3 release on PyPI. The develop branch auto-publishes dev builds (setup.py:86 appends .dev<build> to the VERSION file); the newest at time of testing was 0.5.0b3.dev101. The Perms.ANY = 0 design is long-standing, but only the 0.5.0b3.dev* line was verified here — please confirm whether 0.5.0b2.* and 0.4.x are affected before finalizing the version range.

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Python (PyPI) pyload-ng >= 0.5.0b3.dev1, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 sin corrección

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 8.1/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-287
Plataforma
Python (PyPI)
Paquete
pyload-ng
Publicada
09.10.2026
Actualizado
11.10.2026 15:18

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: pyload-ng

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (58) en el archivo
Entradas en total
58
Primera → última
01.2023 10.2026
Sin corrección
24
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 9
  • Alta 23
  • Media 25
  • Baja 1

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2023: 9
  2. 2024: 8
  3. 2025: 8
  4. 2026: 33
Gravedad:
  1. pyload-ng: getUserData/get_userdata exposed at Perms.ANY allow any authenticated account to brute-force the administrator password esta entrada
    Alta · 8.1 ghsa-68w4-83fh-f2w8 >= 0.5.0b3.dev1, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 sin corrección
  2. Alta · 7.5 ghsa-889w-m37p-88m5 >= 0.5.0b3.dev98, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 sin corrección
  3. Alta · 8.1 ghsa-r44w-v6gf-x3p6 < 0.5.0b3.dev101 0.5.0b3.dev101
  4. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2026-42315 < 0.5.0b3.dev100 0.5.0b3.dev100
  5. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2026-41133 <= 0.5.0b3.dev97 sin corrección
  6. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2026-35463 <= 0.5.0b3.dev96 sin corrección
  7. Alta · 7.7 CVE-2026-35187 <= 0.5.0b3.dev96 sin corrección
  8. Alta · 7.1 CVE-2026-29778 >= 0.5.0b3.dev13, < 0.5.0b3.dev97 0.5.0b3.dev97
  9. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2025-61773 < 0.5.0b3.dev91 0.5.0b3.dev91
  10. Alta CVE-2025-57751 < 0.5.0b3.dev92 0.5.0b3.dev92
Mostrar más (12) Mostrando 20 de 32

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.