Netty HTTP/2 CONTINUATION Frame Flood DoS via Zero-Byte Frame Bypass
Summary
A remote user can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) against a Netty HTTP/2 server by sending a flood of CONTINUATION frames. The server's lack of a limit on the number of CONTINUATION frames, combined with a bypass of existing size-based mitigations using zero-byte frames, allows an user to cause excessive CPU consumption with minimal bandwidth, rendering the server unresponsive.
Details
The vulnerability exists in Netty's DefaultHttp2FrameReader. When an HTTP/2 HEADERS frame is received without the END_HEADERS flag, the server expects one or more subsequent CONTINUATION frames. However, the implementation does not enforce a limit on the count of these CONTINUATION frames.
The key issue is located in codec-http2/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/DefaultHttp2FrameReader.java. The verifyContinuationFrame() method checks for stream association but fails to implement a frame count limit.
Any user can exploit this by sending a stream of CONTINUATION frames with a zero-byte payload. While Netty has a maxHeaderListSize protection to limit the total size of headers, this check is never triggered by zero-byte frames. The logic effectively evaluates to maxHeaderListSize - 0 < currentSize, which will not trigger the limit until a non-zero byte is added. As a result, the server is forced to process an unlimited number of frames, consuming a CPU thread and monopolizing the connection.
codec-http2/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/DefaultHttp2FrameReader.java
verifyContinuationFrame() (lines 381-393) — No frame count check:
private void verifyContinuationFrame() throws Http2Exception {
verifyAssociatedWithAStream();
if (headersContinuation == null) {
throw connectionError(PROTOCOL_ERROR, "...");
}
if (streamId != headersContinuation.getStreamId()) {
throw connectionError(PROTOCOL_ERROR, "...");
}
// NO frame count limit!
}
HeadersBlockBuilder.addFragment() (lines 695-723) — Byte limit bypassed by 0-byte frames:
// Line 710-711: This check NEVER fires when len=0
if (headersDecoder.configuration().maxHeaderListSizeGoAway() - len <
headerBlock.readableBytes()) {
headerSizeExceeded(); // 10240 - 0 < 1 => FALSE always
}
When len=0: maxGoAway - 0 < readableBytes → 10240 < 1 → FALSE. The byte limit is never triggered.
Impact
This is a CPU-based Denial of Service (DoS). Any service using Netty's default HTTP/2 server implementation is impacted. An unauthenticated user can exhaust server CPU resources and block legitimate users, leading to service unavailability. The low bandwidth requirement for the attack makes it highly practical.
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Java / Kotlin (Maven) | io.netty:netty-codec-http2 | < 4.1.132.Final, >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, < 4.2.11.Final | 4.1.132.Final, 4.2.11.Final |
Referencias
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-770- Plataforma
- Java / Kotlin (Maven)
- Paquete
io.netty:netty-codec-http2- Publicada
- 26.03.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 13:20
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-w9fj-cfpg-grvv - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: io.netty:netty-codec-http2
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
- Entradas en total
- 11
- Primera → última
- 03.2021 07.2026
- Sin corrección
- 0
- Explotada en ataques
- 0
Distribución por gravedad
- Alta 5
- Media 6
Divulgaciones por año
- 2021: 2
- 2022: 0
- 2023: 1
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 1
- 2026: 7
-
Netty HTTP/2 CONTINUATION Frame Flood DoS via Zero-Byte Frame Bypass esta entrada
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.