Baja

OpenEXR Makes Use of Uninitialized Memory

  • Publicada: 06.04.2026
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 14:18

Summary

While fuzzing openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer, Valgrind reports a conditional branch depending on uninitialized data inside generic_unpack. This indicates a use of uninitialized memory (CWE-457). The issue is reproducible with the current OSS-Fuzz harness and a single-file PoC.

Details

Environment:

  • Tooling: valgrind --tool=memcheck --track-origins=yes
  • Target: openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer
  • OS: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS focal x86_64
  • openexr version and Git-commit hash: openexr 3.4.2 | commit fd657e8a41e157e5841c7cc2e2a5efe094b069a1 (grafted, HEAD -> main, origin/main, origin/HEAD)

Function: generic_unpack

Possible root cause (based on observed symptoms): The unpacker is branching on bytes in a scratch buffer that were never written because the decode step didn’t fully populate it.

  • The first use flagged is in generic_unpack(). That function reads from the decompressed/expanded pixel buffer to scatter data into the framebuffer. A “conditional jump depends on uninitialised value(s)” means it’s consulting bytes in that buffer before they were written.
  • Valgrind says the uninitialised value “was created by a heap allocation (malloc)”, not the stack: this matches a per-tile/per-scanline decode scratch buffer allocated in exr_decoding_run().

Valgrind Trace (top frames):

bash
==454== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==454==    at 0x4539BE: generic_unpack (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x44B85F: exr_decoding_run (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x38BC5F: Imf_4_0::(anonymous namespace)::TileProcess::run_decode(_priv_exr_context_t const*, int, Imf_4_0::FrameBuffer const*, std::__1::vector<Imf_4_0::Slice, std::__1::allocator<Imf_4_0::Slice> > const&) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x388BE1: Imf_4_0::TiledInputFile::Data::readTiles(int, int, int, int, int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x388619: Imf_4_0::TiledInputFile::readTiles(int, int, int, int, int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x353755: Imf_4_0::InputFile::Data::bufferedReadPixels(int, int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x352286: Imf_4_0::InputFile::readPixels(int) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x3190FA: Imf_4_0::(anonymous namespace)::readMultiPart(Imf_4_0::MultiPartInputFile&, bool, bool) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==    by 0x314C4D: Imf_4_0::checkOpenEXRFile(char const*, unsigned long, bool, bool, bool) (in /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer)
==454==  Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)

PoC

In the attached archive, you will find:

  • The executable used for our tests.
  • The testcase used to trigger the bug.

To observe the bug, simply run the OSS-Fuzz helper script:

bash
git clone https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz.git
cd oss-fuzz

python3 infra/helper.py build_image openexr
python3 infra/helper.py build_fuzzers --sanitizer=none openexr
python3 infra/helper.py shell openexr

apt update && apt install -y valgrind
ulimit -n 65535
valgrind --tool=memcheck --track-origins=yes /out/openexr_exrcheck_fuzzer /path/to/poc

Impact

  • Undefined Behavior
  • Potential crash
  • Denial of Service

Credit: Aldo Ristori archive0.zip

Update Note:

Other saved testcases from the fuzzing campaign trigger the same underlying bug, but with a different manifestation. So there is one root cause (missing post-decode validation / zero-init before any unpack), with different call-sites. Below there are several archives, formatted like the previous one, that reproduce the other test cases.

Other observed sinks (distinct manifestations of the same bug):

Deep pointers path: generic_unpack_deep_pointers (deep scanline/tiled) archive1.zip

Deep sample table path: unpack_sample_table (deep scanline) archive2.zip

Half conversion path: half_to_float_buffer_f16c via unpack_half_to_float_3chan_planar archive3.zip

Deep compositing: CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels → ThreadPool::addTask → LineCompositeTask::execute archive4.zip

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Python (PyPI) openexr >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.6, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.3 3.3.6, 3.4.3

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 7.5/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-457
Plataforma
Python (PyPI)
Paquete
openexr
Publicada
06.04.2026
Actualizado
11.10.2026 14:18

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2843 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-3h9h-qfvw-98hq - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: openexr

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (15) en el archivo
Entradas en total
15
Primera → última
05.2022 04.2026
Sin corrección
0
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Alta 7
  • Media 7
  • Baja 1

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2022: 2
  2. 2023: 0
  3. 2024: 0
  4. 2025: 4
  5. 2026: 9
Gravedad:
  1. Alta · 5.0 CVE-2026-34589 >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.7, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.9, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.9 3.2.7, 3.3.9, 3.4.9
  2. Alta · 7.8 CVE-2026-34588 >= 3.1.0, < 3.2.7, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.9, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.9 3.2.7, 3.3.9, 3.4.9
  3. OpenEXR Makes Use of Uninitialized Memory esta entrada
    Baja · 7.5 CVE-2025-64181 >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.6, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.3 3.3.6, 3.4.3
  4. Alta CVE-2026-34543 >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.8, >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.8, >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.6 3.4.8
  5. Alta CVE-2026-34544 >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.8, >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.8, >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.6 3.4.8
  6. Alta CVE-2026-27622 >= 2.3.0, < 3.2.6, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.8, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.6 3.2.6, 3.3.8, 3.4.6
  7. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2017-9111 < 2.2.1 2.2.1

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.