Medium

jackson-databind: Comparable missing from DefaultBaseTypeLimitingValidator's unsafe base types (incomplete PolymorphicTypeValidator denylist)

  • Disclosed: 28.09.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 13:20

Summary

DefaultBaseTypeLimitingValidator — the PolymorphicTypeValidator used automatically whenever @JsonTypeInfo is applied without an explicitly configured custom validator — denies polymorphic resolution only for nine specific "unsafe base types" (Object, Serializable, Closeable, AutoCloseable, Cloneable, Runnable, java.util.logging.Handler, javax.naming.Referenceable, javax.sql.DataSource). Its isSafeSubType() returns true unconditionally for every other base type. java.lang.Comparable is not in that list, despite being implemented by a very large fraction of JDK and application classes — comparable in breadth to Serializable, which is denylisted for exactly that reason. An application with an @JsonTypeInfo-annotated Comparable-typed property, and no custom validator configured, will accept a type identifier for essentially any class implementing Comparable.

Details

Affected file: src/main/java/tools/jackson/databind/jsontype/DefaultBaseTypeLimitingValidator.java

java
private final static class UnsafeBaseTypes {
    private final Set<String> UNSAFE = new HashSet<>();
    {
        UNSAFE.add(Object.class.getName());
        UNSAFE.add(java.io.Closeable.class.getName());
        UNSAFE.add(java.io.Serializable.class.getName());
        UNSAFE.add(AutoCloseable.class.getName());
        UNSAFE.add(Cloneable.class.getName());
        UNSAFE.add(Runnable.class.getName());          // [databind#5014]
        UNSAFE.add("java.util.logging.Handler");
        UNSAFE.add("javax.naming.Referenceable");
        UNSAFE.add("javax.sql.DataSource");
        // java.lang.Comparable is NOT present here
    }
}

protected boolean isSafeSubType(DatabindContext ctxt,
        JavaType baseType, JavaType subType) {
    return true;   // unconditional for every base type not in UNSAFE
}

The class's own JavaDoc acknowledges the design ("Note that when using potentially unsafe base type like java.lang.Object a custom implementation... is needed"), so the trade-off of leaving broad base types unrestricted is intentional. The gap is that Comparable has the same breadth of implementers as the types this class does restrict, and its absence looks like an oversight rather than a deliberate choice — consistent with the ongoing, incremental nature of this list (Runnable was added recently for issue #5014).

This is specific to the default, unconfigured validator reached via bare @JsonTypeInfo usage. Global "Default Typing" via activateDefaultTyping() is not affected, because that method structurally requires an explicit PolymorphicTypeValidator argument — a correctly-configured BasicPolymorphicTypeValidator rejects the same payload under activateDefaultTyping().

PoC

Built entirely from source (jackson-databind + jackson-core + jackson-annotations, javac, OpenJDK 21, no third-party gadget libraries, no network access):

1. Sanity check (benign class, confirms the mechanism fires):

java
static class SafeThing implements Comparable<SafeThing> {
    public String name;
    public SafeThing() {}
    public int compareTo(SafeThing o) { return 0; }
}
static class Holder {
    @JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS)
    public Comparable<?> value;
}

ObjectMapper mapper = JsonMapper.builder().build();   // no custom PTV
String json = "{\"value\":{\"@class\":\"...SafeThing\",\"name\":\"hello\"}}";
Holder h = mapper.readValue(json, Holder.class);
// RESULT: ACCEPTED, class=...SafeThing

2. Real JDK class substitution:

java
String json = "{\"value\":[\"java.io.File\",\"/etc/passwd\"]}";
Holder h = mapper.readValue(json, Holder.class);
// RESULT: ACCEPTED, class=java.io.File value=/etc/passwd

3. Negative control — Default Typing with an explicit custom PTV:

java
PolymorphicTypeValidator ptv = BasicPolymorphicTypeValidator.builder()
    .allowIfSubType("PtvGapTest4").build();
ObjectMapper mapper = JsonMapper.builder()
    .activateDefaultTyping(ptv, DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL).build();
// same java.io.File payload
// RESULT: REJECTED - InvalidTypeIdException: "...denied resolution"

Observed output:

$ java -cp .:build/classes PtvGapTest3 Trying: {"value":["java.io.File","/etc/passwd"]} ACCEPTED, class=java.io.File value=/etc/passwd

$ java -cp .:build/classes PtvGapTest4 Trying malicious substitution: ["PtvGapTest4$Holder",{"value":["java.io.File","/etc/passwd"]}] REJECTED - InvalidTypeIdException: Could not resolve type id 'java.io.File' as a subtype of java.lang.Comparable: Configured PolymorphicTypeValidator denied resolution

Impact

Any application declaring an @JsonTypeInfo-annotated property or class with Comparable as its base type, without a separately configured restrictive PolymorphicTypeValidator, will accept a type identifier for essentially any class implementing Comparable. Concrete impact is demonstrated via java.io.File: an attacker can cause construction of a File object for an arbitrary, attacker-chosen path. On its own this is a controlled-object-instantiation primitive; if the application later calls path-sensitive or mutating methods on the received value, this becomes a path-traversal-adjacent primitive.

Suggested remediation:

  1. Add java.lang.Comparable to UnsafeBaseTypes.UNSAFE.
  2. Audit other broad JDK interfaces (java.lang.Iterable, java.util.EventListener) for the same gap.
  3. Consider a narrower default for isSafeSubType() for base types outside the fixed denylist, rather than unconditional true.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 2.11.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
Java / Kotlin (Maven) tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.6, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.2 3.1.6, 3.2.2

References

CVSS score 5.6/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-502, CWE-915
Platform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Package
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Disclosed
28.09.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 13:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-gx83-3vf8-gh7j - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (86) in the archive
Total entries
86
First → latest
10.2018 09.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 24
  • High 48
  • Medium 14

Disclosures per year

  1. 2018: 4
  2. 2019: 19
  3. 2020: 23
  4. 2021: 18
  5. 2022: 4
  6. 2023: 1
  7. 2024: 0
  8. 2025: 0
  9. 2026: 17
Severity:
  1. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91777 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.5.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.21.7, 2.18.11, 2.22.3
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91776 >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.18.11, 2.21.7, 2.22.3
  3. jackson-databind: Comparable missing from DefaultBaseTypeLimitingValidator's unsafe base types (incomplete PolymorphicTypeValidator denylist) this entry
    Medium · 5.6 CVE-2026-83557 >= 2.11.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
  4. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-68497 >= 2.14.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
  5. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54513 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4 2.18.8, 2.21.4, 3.1.4
  6. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54512 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4 2.18.8, 3.1.4, 2.21.4
  7. High · 7.5 CVE-2021-46877 >= 2.10.0, < 2.12.6, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.1 2.12.6, 2.13.1
  8. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42003 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4.2 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
  9. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42004 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
  10. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-10650 < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  11. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-36518 >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.2.1, < 2.12.6.1 2.13.2.1, 2.12.6.1
  12. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36189 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  13. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36187 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  14. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36188 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  15. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36183 >= 2.7.00, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  16. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36184 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  17. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36180 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  18. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36181 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  19. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36185 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  20. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36179 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  21. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36182 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  22. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24750 >= 2.0, < 2.6.7.5, >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.6.7.5, 2.9.10.6
  23. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35728 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  24. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35491 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  25. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35490 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  26. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24616 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.9.10.6
  27. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36186 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  28. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-25649 >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0.0, < 2.9.10.7, >= 2.10.0.0, < 2.10.5.1 2.6.7.4, 2.9.10.7, 2.10.5.1
  29. High · 8.1 CVE-2021-20190 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.7, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.7, 2.6.7.5
  30. High · 8.1 CVE-2018-5968 >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.1, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.4, < 2.7.9.5 2.8.11.1, 2.9.4, 2.7.9.5
  31. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14061 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  32. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14062 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  33. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14060 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  34. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14195 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  35. High · 7.5 CVE-2018-12023 >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
  36. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-17267 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, < 2.8.11.5 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5
  37. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11112 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  38. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9547 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  39. High CVE-2019-14893 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.9.10
  40. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10673 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4 2.9.10.4, 2.6.7.4
Show more (20) Showing 40 of 73

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.